U.S. Supreme Court sides with La Mesa heirs in dispute over Nazi-looted painting

  • 📰 sdut
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 32 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 95%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The unanimous decision sends the case -- filed 17 years ago -- back to lower courts

In a unanimous decision announced Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the La Mesa heirs of a Jewish woman whose French Impressionist painting was looted by the Nazis during World War II and is hanging now in a Spanish museum.

“Although the legal issue before us is prosaic,” Justice Elena Kagan said in delivering the opinion Thursday, “the case’s subject matter and background are anything but.” In 1976, it was purchased for $275,000 at a gallery in New York by a Swiss art collector named Baron Hans Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza, the son of a steel magnate. He hung it in the master bedroom suite of his villa in Lugano, Switzerland.

Cassirer died in 2010. His son, David, and daughter, Ava, took over as plaintiffs. She passed away in 2018. David Cassirer, a longtime San Diego County resident, lives now in Montana and Colorado.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Anita Hill Saw History Repeat Itself at Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court HearingsThe key witness in Clarence Thomas’s nomination process joins David Remnick and Jane Mayer to discuss how sex and race shaped the new Justice’s experience, and her own. 💜💜🤩🤩💛❤😍😍🥰🥰🤎🤎 💢👇🏼🔞👇🏼💢 I am white, and it was an incident that a black twelve year old pointed out when I was twelve years old and a remarkable black woman I met in Atlanta that made me think differently. And what happened to Anita added to my thinking.
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court considers if police should be sued over failure to read Miranda rightsThe Supreme Court will soon decide a Fifth Amendment-related case over whether a person accused of a crime can seek relief if a law enforcement officer failed to recite Miranda warnings.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

South Carolina Supreme Court Pauses State's First Firing Squad ExecutionCondemned prisoner Richard Bernard Moore was forced to choose whether he will be shot or electrocuted to death—methods his lawyers call \u0022barbaric.\u0022 Everyone who can should make a pilgrimage to eji_org. Just saying. If South Carolina deems murder a crime, then why does it premeditatedly and savagely commit it? And while we're at it, what century is this? Shame on all of us!
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Man's firing squad execution halted by South Carolina Supreme CourtSouth Carolina’s first-ever firing squad execution of Richard Bernard Moore was halted on Wednesday by the state’s Supreme Court. Oh shoot. Time to fire it back up yippee
Source: KTVU - 🏆 465. / 53 Read more »