, the potential juror was a man aged in his 50s or 60s who said he would not be able to remain unbiased if selected for the jury because he had seen Kardashian's sex tape.
The man then reiterated to the judge that he could not serve as a juror because he would be"replaying that sex tape over and over again" in his head. "In respect of the comments made by a potential juror, my personal view is that it is entirely unacceptable for a juror to be making such comments, especially given the reaction from the said comment," said Manjinder Singh Kang, director of Kang & Co Solicitors in the U.K.
The lawyer explained that the juror should have expressed these concerns in writing to a judge to avoid causing Kardashian embarrassment in this manner, and to avoid influencing other potential jurors.