It barely matters that the Post brought in some"experts" later to offer the"other side"—that actually talking about these things in fact helps curtail sexual abuse and bullying against LGBTQ+ kids. In giving the GOP the headline and the lead, Natanson and Balingit gave a bigoted and dangerous campaign the right to frame the story as a debate with two somehow comparable sides.
how a town grappling with an undeniable incident of racism can serve as fertile ground for the ongoing national war over whether racism is embedded in American society. Last week's"grooming" piece was perhaps even worse, in that not only did they both-sides the issue—which is egregious enough—Natanson and Balingit gave a much bigger spotlight to the bigoted and dangerous"side." They quoted ten sources defending the"Don't Say Gay" laws or attacking their opponents, front-loading most of them, and only six opposed—half of whom appeared after the 33rd paragraph, for those who've stuck around long enough to hear them.
In framing the piece, Natanson and Balingit wrote that the argument over"grooming""draws on previous tactics adopted by the right to oppose the erosion of traditional gender roles at moments of societal transition, experts say." As media critic Dan Froomkin pointed out,"opposing the erosion of traditional gender roles" is quite a euphemism for the right's past homophobic and misogynistic campaigns against basic rights for women and lesbians and gays.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: HoustonChron - 🏆 609. / 51 Read more »