A Lake in Florida Suing to Protect Itself

  • 📰 NewYorker
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 66 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 30%
  • Publisher: 67%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A number of animals, as well as entire species, have tried to defend their rights in a court of law. Mary Jane, a lake suing the state of Florida, is the first of its kind.

When Ecuador’s new constitution was adopted, in 2008, it marked another, much more significant world first. The constitution’s preamble celebrates, usually translated from Quechua as “Mother Earth,” and a later section enumerates the rights thatenjoys. These include “the right to integral respect for its existence” and “the right to be restored.

With the help of some other Orange County residents, O’Neal wrote up a “bill of rights” for the Wekiva River and for the Econlockhatchee, a second river that passes near Orlando. He presented the bill to a commission that had been appointed to revise Orange County’s charter. To his surprise, the commission didn’t just take up his proposal; it expanded it.

What had once perhaps been the house’s den was bathed in violet light and outfitted with speakers. Dierdorff told us that he was also collecting sound: at each waterway he sampled, he stuck a waterproof mike into the depths. He had layered sixteen of these recordings on top of one another, and the resulting track was playing on a loop. “I think of it as kind of a chorus,” he said.

The objection that streams and forests cannot have standing because streams and forests cannot speak was, in Stone’s view, easily addressed. “Corporations cannot speak either,” he observed. “Nor can states, estates, infants, incompetents, municipalities or universities.” And yet these entities were amply represented—some might say overrepresented—in the courts.

“I’m a personal-injury lawyer,” he told me as soon as I sat down. Mostly he filed workers’-comp cases. He had got involved with O’Neal, he explained, because of a dead bear.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Reparations for Descendants of Chattel Slaves in the US

Interesting. I like this. We really do not need any more development anyway.

It shouldn't need to happen. Some might say it's ridiculous. But is it any more ridiculous than ... ... thinking a dollar has more value than the life-giving planet?

ShortyPullYourMaskUp thebrokenplate MayorBMScott BlackInAmerica blackpolitics kayewhitehead BlackCaucusMD blackaussie1 Out4JusticeOrg BTUBaltimore TheGarlandSitIn JHUWontTellYou scanthepolice bmoreR4J surjbaltimore reginatboyce SheilaRuthD44B peterfranchot FBI

If corporations are people, why not nature?

Why not? A bunch of cells that may turn out to die and decay before being excreted or said cells may split into several protohumans and they are considered to have more rights than a real living woman. Why not a lake?

💢👎🛑🚫 development at the cost of what's left of our lakes, marshes, hammocks, nature. We don't need more housing ❌🏘️🏘️🏘️❌that plows through the sparse remnants that remain of our ecosystem & already crippled RiverOfGrass 🦅🌱🎍🐊& dwindling💧Aquifer💧SaveMaryJane‼️

I peed last night,feeling was like lot of semen coming out of womb,and a Russian female sniper be captured. that’s like all senior western athletes,artists,good people,Intelligencers… be found,put in psychiatric hospitals,deprived all money,killed by China and brain-control.

ElizKolbert So great to see this coverage, thanks ElizKolbert. For those interested in diving deeper, ample resources on rightsofnature are here:

ElizKolbert How much dope do you think that dude was smoking?

ElizKolbert What a goldmine for NIMBYs.

Colorado River tried this a few years ago.

If a corporation can have the same rights as humans, then so can natural objects. If you kill a corporation or a forest then, you would be charged with murder, right?

That’s great news! Coincidentally, the Mar Menor, a severely polluted saltwater lagoon in southeastern Spain, has recently been granted “legal personality” by the Spanish Congress of Deputies. SalvemosElMarMenor SosMarMenor CC ilp_marmenor

It’s such a western frame - it was put forward 1/2 a century ago in westerns law. Indigenous cultures and ways of knowing have seen “natural objects” as having “rights” for millennia - like since forever.

thebax33 No rights for nature, but corporations, corporations are people too.

HOLY CRAP THIS IS AN EXCELLENT IDEA. I was literally just thinking about all the old trees in my neighborhood we've lost

🤩🤩🤩❤❤😍😍❤❤🤩🤩🤩

This sounds like mary_roach material! Reading Fuzz now!

About time. If corporations, human constructs, can be considered as 'persons', why should natural life and formations not have the same right under the law?

América Andina e Índia fazendo escola

👇🏼⚠️🔞⚠️👇🏼

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 90. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines