The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to a California ballot measure that would force pork producers across the country to end “extreme methods” of confining breeding pigs.
The court’s action casts some doubt on the future of the state measure, which has forced major changes in the egg and veal industries. Several large meatpacking companies, including Hormel, announced they would comply with California’s law, but the National Pork Producers Council and the American Farm Bureau Federation went to court arguing the state was violating the Constitution’s protection for the free flow of interstate commerce.
A federal judge in San Diego dismissed their suit on the grounds the producers had no claim of a constitutional violation, and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed last year.Early in U.S. history, the Supreme Court took a broader view and said states may not interfere with or discriminate against interstate commerce, even if Congress takes no action.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »
Source: KPIXtv - 🏆 443. / 53 Read more »
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court agrees to hear challenge to law regulating how pigs are raisedUS Supreme Court agrees to take up challenge to a California law regulating how pigs are raised that pork producers say sets unrealistic requirements and amounts to regulating the industry nationwide. Pork producers that don’t feel they want to, or can, follow CA’s regulations are welcome to not sell in CA… Large corporate farms are the new normal in farming. God forbid we humans treat animals with the very least amount of compassion before we end the miserable, horrific lives we forced upon them. Shame on anyone who can’t empathize.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Source: KPIXtv - 🏆 443. / 53 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »