A Hamilton family court judge has ruled in favour of a mother who does not want two of her children to be vaccinated against COVID-19, suggesting in his written decision that she presented credible evidence from the internet that the jab may have dangerous side effects.
“Now he’s saying she’s not protective enough,” Ontario Superior Court Justice Alex Pazaratz wrote of the father in his Feb. 22 judgment.for children aged 12-17. About 90 per cent of Ontario children between those ages have been vaccinated, including the couple’s eldest son. Malone, who among other things falsely claims the COVID-19 vaccine is ineffective, has been widely denounced by medical experts as a high-profile source of anti-vax misinformation, including with appearances on Fox News and Joe Rogan’s podcast.
Pazaratz’s ruling also includes references to other medical experts who have been accused of spreading vaccine misinformation. Further summarizing the mother’s position, the judge said pro-vaccine parents “have consistently attempted to frame the issue as a contest between reputable government experts versus a lunatic fringe consisting of conspiracy theorists, and socially reprehensible extremists.
No based on the data released and science kids should not be vaxxed
I am ok with this. As long as some people, adults and children remain naturally susceptible to covid the more opportunity we will get to study the disease as it naturally occurs.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: CBCAlerts - 🏆 37. / 63 Read more »