How is Proposition 208 not a conflict for Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick?

  • 📰 azcentral
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 49 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

From opinion columnist elviadiaz1: If his wife's election audit involvement was too much for Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick, why aren't her efforts to stop Proposition 208?

That’s good.

Oddly, Justice Bolick didn’t bother to do the same with Proposition 208, the voter-approved measure to fund public schools that Republicans want to strike down. His wife, as a lawmaker, also has a beef over it.urging Congress to reject the electoral votes for Biden. That, effectively, means she wanted Congress to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Weird reasoning at best. Any reasonable person would find this a clear and convincing conflict of interest.The entanglement is complicated, drawing little public attention. The couple seems to be banking on that to keep doing their thing without much public scrutiny over their connection.Shawnna Bolick has made no qualms about Proposition 208, which would tax the wealthiest Arizonans and raise an estimated $800 million annually to help fund public K-12 schools.

It sent the case back to a lower court to determine if the tax revenues to be raised actually exceed the spending limit.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

elviadiaz1 Link might be wrong

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 585. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Being the 1st: What It's Like to Make Supreme Court HistoryJust being the newest member of the Supreme Court can be a momentous adjustment for a justice
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »

William Kuenzel, sentenced to Alabama Death Row in 1988, dead of cancerKuenzel appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court for a new hearing, arguing that prosecutors withheld key evidence in his trial, but the justices rejected his appeal without comment in 2016. Where's the obituary for his victim? Sentenced to death in 1988 so why is it even possible to die from cancer this many decades later? 🤦‍♀️🤷‍♀️
Source: aldotcom - 🏆 82. / 68 Read more »

Being the 1st: What it's like to make Supreme Court history'It's all right to be the first to do something, but I didn't want to be the last woman on the Supreme Court,' Sandra Day O'Connor said in 2012.
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »

Trump's 'days are numbered'—Kirschner predicts ex-president to be indicted'It's not coming quickly enough but Justice is coming,' the former U.S. Army prosecutor said Saturday. Oy vey, enough of this speculation garbage. Trump ain’t going to jail For all those who are new to this working from home Bitcoin trading options Here's a little tip: Get a trusted Bitcoin expert and stick to her _elizabeth467 Invest and play at similar times each day. Because : In times of chaos, your investment is your anchor to success
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Ted Cruz says he won’t engage in attacks against Biden’s Supreme Court pickSen. Ted Cruz said Sunday that President Biden’s forthcoming Supreme Court nominee should not expect personal attacks akin to what Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh faced during his 2018 confirmation to the high court. So if the justice the Dems pick is credibly accused of sexual assault you won't question her about it? Kavanaugh lied under oath Ted breaking from the US
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »