Which is the kind of thing that happens when the professions fail to learn from Johnson’s example that the correct approach to hiring women, allowing for occasional lapses, is not to do it in the first place.
“[Boris Johnson] once depicted female employment as “an ever-growing proportion of British women [who] have been ‘incentivised’ or socially gestapoed into the workplace”.” 😐
You start with the premise that he's misogynistic, and build on that. Your original premise is flawed but you get away with it because this is what your readers expect from you. It doesn't make it right.
For a misogynist he doesn’t have much problem finding women who want to have his babies.