The decision leaves in place a way to vote on legislation that many lawmakers see as critical to minimizing the spread of coronavirus in Congress – and one that even critics have taken advantage of.
The House, where the rules are decided by the controlling party — in this case Democrats, recently took to combat the virus amid the Omicron surge, including placing restrictions on congregating in the chamber.that the House's internal decision-making is not subject to judicial review under the Constitution's Speech or Debate clause.
The lawsuit argued proxy voting rules are unconstitutional because the Constitution requires the House to have a physical quorum to conduct business.Roughly 80% of members, including many Republicans who signed onto the lawsuit, have used proxy voting as of December,
Kevin is still firmly in control of the GQP narrative. Don't - for a single sec - believe this spells disaster for him. Watch him double down and find another avenue of approach to throw a monkey wrench into the works. He'll do it. And next time he'll win.
Guess they want to keep the other branch of government safe-but they refused to support the president's vaccine mandate-go figure?!
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Jan. 6 panel obtains Trump White House records after Supreme Court rulingThe National Archives and Records Administration has provided a House committee with more than 700 pages of presidential documents. Thank you GOD!!!!
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Supreme Court won’t speed challenge to Texas abortion limitsOver dissents from the three liberal justices, the court declined to order a federal appeals court to return the case to a federal judge who had temporarily blocked the law’s enforcement. The court offered no explanation for its action.
Source: AKNewsNow - 🏆 460. / 53 Read more »
Opinion | How the Supreme Court mask controversy is missing the pointSteven Lubet: The focus on whether Justice Gorsuch was or wasn’t asked to wear a face covering misses the point: He shouldn’t have had to be asked in the first place. - NBCNewsTHINK THINK ThePerezHilton THINK Who says he didn't have a mask on when around others. Typical NBC fake news. THINK Masks And The Vax Do Not Stop You From Getting Covid
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
University Hospitals reinstates vaccine requirement for caregivers after Supreme Court ruling'Since the vaccine became available in late 2020, we have encouraged our caregivers to get vaccinated and made vaccines readily available to them.' ALL CAREGIVERS should be vaccinated worldwide. They don’t work
Source: cleveland19news - 🏆 70. / 68 Read more »
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?“Ginni Thomas is behaving horribly, and she’s hurt the Supreme Court and the administration of justice,” the judicial ethicist Stephen Gillers said. “If you could take a secret poll of the other eight Justices, I have no doubt that they are appalled.” No actually Clarance is the threat. i actually do doubt this lmao. maybe like a couple other justices tops I appreciate that this illustration makes her look every bit as ghastly as she actually is
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »
Supreme Court takes cases on future of affirmative actionJUST IN: The U.S. Supreme Court says it will take up a pair of cases that could decide the future of affirmative action in college admissions. Today SCOTUS put private affirmative action on the block, just as it did protection of voting rights for blacks in the South. Shamelessly. The Supreme Court isn’t wasting time overturning established law. Ugh! And you ask yourself what good is Clarence Thompson to colored pple really - it would seem he agrees with every bad thing meted out to blacks.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »