But unlike tennis, the online federal court hearing that opens at 10:00 am Monday may not end with a simple win or loss.If judge Anthony Kelly decides in favour of Djokovic, it would quash the cancellation of his visa, which would become valid again.
They have also asked the judge to rule"at the earliest time possible", without waiting to craft his legal reasoning that they say could be released later.But the government is sure to appeal such a ruling, said Christopher Levingston, an accredited specialist in migration law with more than 20 years of experience.
Levingston said the government's case relied on a section of migration law that he believes"will ultimately see Mr Djokovic fail in his application". In that scenario, Djokovic's lawyers would have to argue that there has been an error and probably flag some untested point of law, he added.
Arrogance of a white man
Adios amigo
If his deportation is still confirmed, and he loses his number 1 ranking, then the following player will not be recognised as number 1 player. Alternatively his home country would recall their ambassador and give 🇦🇺 ambassador and diplomatic staff to leave country in 14 days.
That's like ausy government for you. Why are vaccinated people afraid of unvaccinated ones if they are safe and protected?
Novax Djokovic, the first player to be knocked out of a grandslam for missing two shots.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TheCitizen_News - 🏆 6. / 75 Read more »