The newspaper reported it would appeal the ruling and seek a stay in the meantime. Publisher A.G. Sulzberger decried the ruling as an attack of press freedoms and alarming for “anyone concerned about the dangers of government overreach into what the public can and cannot know.” He also said it risked exposing sources.
Project Veritas bills itself as a watchdog, often of media. It's known for using hidden cameras and hiding identities to try to ensnare journalists in embarrassing conversations and to reveal supposed liberal bias. “The New York Times has long forgotten the meaning of the journalism it claims to espouse, and has instead become a vehicle for the prosecution of a partisan political agenda,” Locke said. “Today’s ruling affirms that the New York Times’ behavior was irregular and outside the boundaries of law.”
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Judge upholds ruling against NYT over Project Veritas memos | AP NewsNEW YORK (AP) — A New York judge has upheld an order preventing The New York Times from publishing documents between conservative group Project Veritas and its lawyer and ruled that the newspaper must immediately relinquish confidential legal memos it obtained. nytimes Why is it that they put press fredoms behind a pay wall 🤔 nytimes So NYT get sued by Project Veritas, the fbi raids the the journalists of PV and documents get ‘leaked’ to the NYT? And people celebrate this Fascism? Wtf? nytimes I'm pretty sure that decision is correct, considering the principle, and need for, attorney client privilege. If the documents were leaked due to negligence or lack of security, that may change the equation, but put liability on the law firm. Attorney Client Privilege is sacred.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Judge upholds ruling against NYT over Project Veritas memos | AP NewsNEW YORK (AP) — A New York judge has upheld an order preventing The New York Times from publishing documents between conservative group Project Veritas and its lawyer and ruled that the newspaper must immediately relinquish confidential legal memos it obtained. nytimes Why is it that they put press fredoms behind a pay wall 🤔 nytimes So NYT get sued by Project Veritas, the fbi raids the the journalists of PV and documents get ‘leaked’ to the NYT? And people celebrate this Fascism? Wtf? nytimes I'm pretty sure that decision is correct, considering the principle, and need for, attorney client privilege. If the documents were leaked due to negligence or lack of security, that may change the equation, but put liability on the law firm. Attorney Client Privilege is sacred.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
New York Times ordered to destroy legal memos, reporting on Project VeritasInsider tells the global tech, finance, markets, media, healthcare, and strategy stories you want to know. 法官规定《纽约时报》必须销毁文件，不得发表有关保守派团体的报道 If the well is poisoned it cannot be burned because we must first understand why and how much it cost. It's called attorney-client privelege.
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »