High court ruled Fraser ‘acted irrationally, unlawfully and unconstitutionally’ by overturning parole board’s decisionThe Pretoria high court has ruled that former president Jacob Zuma must return to prison. File picture.ommissioner of correctional services Arthur Fraser’s reasons for his decision to release former president Jacob Zuma on medical parole were outlined and rejected on Wednesday by the high court in Pretoria.
“It is directed that the third respondent be returned to the custody of the department of correctional services to serve out the remainder of his sentence.” Twenty days after Zuma went into custody, a SA Military Health Services doctor who had examined Zuma applied for medical parole on the former president’s behalf, stating Zuma was suffering from a terminal disease or a condition that is chronic and progressive.
“The applicant being Mr JG Zuma, 79 years of age, presents as stated herein above, a complex medical condition which predisposes him to unpredictable medical fallouts or events of high-risk clinical picture,” reported Mphatswe. Three days after the board decided not to recommend medical parole, Fraser decided to place Zuma on medical parole.
He said the medical parole advisory board recommendation had agreed Zuma suffered from multiple comorbidities.
You mean Stellenbosch judge
The court is being vindictive by ordering Zuma to restart his sentence. Did he grant himself parole?
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TheCitizen_News - 🏆 6. / 75 Read more »
Zuma unlawfully ‘enjoying his sentence sitting at home’ is in breach of the rule of lawBecause of Arthur Fraser’s unlawful intervention, former president Jacob Zuma was “enjoying nearly three months of his sentence sitting at home in Nkandla [and] not serving his sentence in any meaningful sense,” the Pretoria high court said on Wednesday. Karma is a bitch Reports indicated that Fraser was mandated & authorized to grant parole. His decision was known to Ramaphosa & Lamola. If unlawful why was it not stopped and rejected at all costs in the first place? This issue will again plunge us into instability unless if that is the objective This Gauteng high court has a mandate.
Source: TimesLIVE - 🏆 28. / 59 Read more »
Court rules Zuma must go back to jail after medical parole set asideThe high court declared the decision to grant the former president medical parole unlawful so according High Court who is at faulty here,is it a person who gave him a medical parole?so was it wrong or right for Mr President approving it? now do shaik
Source: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 Read more »
Source: News24 - 🏆 4. / 80 Read more »