Supreme Court Rules Against Texas In Abortion Case—Partially—But Leaves Law In Place

  • 📰 Forbes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 72 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 32%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court delivered a partial win to abortion providers, but the court declined to block the Texas law entirely

The Supreme Court delivered a win to abortion providers Friday as it largely sided with them in a challenge to Texas’ restrictive abortion law—but while the court’s ruling will now let the litigation move forward in the lower courts against some defendants, the conservative-leaning court declined to block the restrictive law as it plays out and ruled against a separate challenge brought by the federal government....

The order says the abortion providers do have the right to bring a lawsuit in federal court that challenges the law even before they’re sued under it—as the law allows any private citizen to sue anyone who performs or “aids or abets” an abortion in the state—which Texas had argued should not be allowed.

The court ruled not to let the lawsuit move forward against other defendants that had been named in the lawsuit, however, including Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, state court clerks who would process lawsuits filed under SB 8 and the state judges who would hear those lawsuits. Only Justice Clarence Thomas dissented and said he would not have let the lawsuit proceed against any of the named defendants.a challenge to SB 8 brought by the Biden administration, ruling the federal government’s petition was “improvidently granted” and should not have been taken up by the court in the first place—it also declined to vacate a stay against a lower court order that would have temporarily blocked the law as it moved forward.

The ruling noted Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the decision and would have vacated the stay.Though they sided with the court’s ruling to let the lawsuit against the state licensing officials proceed, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan ruled they would have let the challenge proceed against other defendants as well.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Start passing MandatoryVasectomies now. Get ahead of this. Put male bodies on the line for a change.

Stench

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 394. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Leaves Texas Abortion Law in PlaceIn a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that the controversial Texas abortion law that restricts the procedure to women pregnant for 6 weeks or less may continue to be enforced. This ruling is so cowardly.🤦🏽‍♀️ As this thread demonstrates, freedom of religion looks to be in direct conflict with freedom of speech. I believe we can start with this to help construct a stronger barrier between church and state, making the state much more sober Since what some religious ppl seek from other religious people is considerably worse (they most likely want them to go ahead & give birth, trusting in God. Even if u discovered, u have connective tissue condition after becoming pregnant), they impose unrealistic demands on others
Source: WebMD - 🏆 709. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Rules Against Texas In Abortion Case — Partially—But Leaves Law In PlaceThe court ruled to let litigation against the abortion law move forward against certain defendants, but didn’t issue an injunction that blocks the law.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court lets Texas abortion law continue but says providers can sueBREAKING: Justices say abortion providers have the right to challenge the law that bars the procedure after around six weeks of pregnancy in federal court. I swear to you that I need money. Please help me. My daughter needs surgery, and I am poor. My situation is very difficult. This is the address of my wallet in Bitcoin for anyone who can help me🙏🏻🙏🏻 3NgY2RXpTpuDd2jKUfSzy37LxtzTyEkEhP Youngkin won in Virginia. Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted. Federal judge blocked vax manadates. Senate blocked vax mandates. Cuomo booted. Smollet hoax exposed. Things are turning. Keep pushing. Let’s Go Brandon. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 So no more bounty hunters🤦‍♀️
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Supreme Court lets Texas abortion law continue, but says providers can sueThe Supreme Court left in place a Texas abortion law that bars the procedure after the first six weeks of pregnancy, but the justices said that abortion providers had the right to challenge the law in federal court. Follow here for the latest news. Women and girls are not equal in America The author of this article either doesn't understand the Court's decision or is deliberately misleading people. I'm hoping that Hanlon's razor applies here.
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

Court won't stop Texas abortion ban, but OKs clinics' suitThe Supreme Court has ruled that Texas abortion providers can sue over the state’s ban on most abortions, but the justices are allowing the law to remain in effect. The court acted Friday, more than a month after hearing arguments over the law that makes abortion illegal after cardiac activity is detected in an embryo. The outcome is at best only a partial victory for abortion providers.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »