The Supreme Court appears poised to reject a fundamental principle of constitutional law: the proposition that states have a compelling interest in keeping religion out of public schools. Six Republican-appointed justices indicated on Wednesday that preserving a secular public education system constitutes “religious discrimination” in violation of the First Amendment.
that states may erect a wall between church and state that goes higher than the Establishment Clause requires, acknowledging “antiestablishment interests” in preventing entanglement of religion and government.For most of the 20th century, the Supreme Court mandated religious neutrality in public education. Now a majority of justices think this neutrality is “odious” discrimination.
values as the bedrock of public education, Maine disfavors institutions that would rather instill overtly religious values.
I'd call Gorsuch a swine, but that would be an insult to pigs and other creatures of the family Suidae.
Next up: witches burned at the stake.
We have to reform this out of control court. LGBTQ people and other marginalized groups should not have to help pay for their own discrimination, Gorsuch thinks that's funny .
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Tax dollars for religious school tuition? Supreme Court conservatives warm to the ideaTwo families from Maine ask the U.S. Supreme Court to expand taxpayer support for religious schools by requiring a state tuition assistance program to include sectarian as well as nonsectarian institutions. No, separation is critical. Also, if they want tax dollars maybe they need to put some into the pot No. 100% no. No. Our Tax dollars shouldn't go to support religious education. We keep Church and State Separate.🇺🇸
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court conservatives sound skeptical of state funding exclusion for religious educationThe Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority appeared willing to broaden the scope of public funding for religious education. Maybe they should read about the separation of church and state in the Constitution
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Justices appear poised to force taxpayers to fund religious education.MaddowBlog: Can taxpayers be forced to fund religious education? The Supreme Court appears likely to answer that question in a discouraging way. MaddowBlog Jesus fucking Christ MaddowBlog Will that include Muslim education? Hindu education? Buddhist education? Etc Etc? Which 'religions' are included or not? That's why the Founders wanted wall of separation of religion from the state. Who decides? I bet that question was not addressed by Scotus SquawkCNBC MaddowBlog Taxpayers pay for the education of children. The money should go to the school best suited to the child, if that's a religious school then so be it. The state's obligation should be to the child, not the school.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Opinion | Supreme Court poised to chuck separation of church and state out the windowCaroline Mala Corbin: Such a ruling means taxpayers will have to pay for religious indoctrination that's not only contrary to their own values, but also denies their own equality. - NBCNewsTHINK THINK Religion is not legal in U.S. police are not legal. Medecine is not legal. We began this country to fight rackets like police medicine and religion. THINK Religious schools that teaches against homosexuality that preaches against individualism religious liberties shouldn’t override separation of church and state. THINK I thought I've lost it all with the little cash of $1,000 invest with Hendricksnino77 turn that into $146,601.43 in 7days duration. you may not know him but he really save my life Hendricksnino77
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Court of appeals block Trump's executive privilege claim, rule Biden gets final sayFormer President Donald Trump's attorneys have signaled they will appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court. and they will lose again We all knew that appeal would quickly come... Where will he go after the Supreme Court?
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »