Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed one count of illegal possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
But the judge cited an exception within the law, dealing with age of the defendant, length of the barrel and hunting, for dismissing that count. "But the criminal statute itself is more complicated than that. For this statute to apply, the defendant had to also violate a hunting regulation that only applied to people under 16. The defense discovered what was essentially an error in the legislation, that Kyle Rittenhouse cannot violate a law that only applies to someone under 16.”He isin the slaying of Anthony Huber, 26, and reckless homicide in the death of Joseph Rosenbaum, 36.
😡
The whole situation is sad-this kid made a bad choice and comes from his upbringing-no winners. But he has to get some sort of punishment for murder-gun to fist fight is not self defense
Good luck Kyle. You did what many wanted to but haven’t the balls. You risked your life and future to protect someone’s Business and income for their families while assholes tore the city apart.
What ? He killed two people and the weapon is dismissed?
Why has this not been a miss trial already just from the judges actions
can you fire a judge? asking for all of America
This judge is incompetent. The kid is at least guilty of illegal weapon possession but nooo, he comes up with some BS technicality.
And that's good news! RittenhouseIsInnocent
?
“The defense discovered what was essentially an error in the legislation, that Kyle Rittenhouse cannot violate a law that only applies to someone under 16.”
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »