Use-of-force expert at Rittenhouse trial zeroes in on just a few minutes

  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 92%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Prosecutor in Rittenhouse murder trial tangles again with judge

Less than three seconds elapsed between the time a protester in the streets fired a shot in the air and Kyle Rittenhouse opened fire with his rifle, a use-of-force expert testified for the defence Thursday at Rittenhouse’s murder trial.

Prosecutors, for their part, have stressed a much longer window, saying the tragic chain of events occurred over hours, starting with Rittenhouse’s fateful decision to go to a volatile protest with a rifle. The case has divided Americans over whether Rittenhouse was a patriot taking a stand against lawlessness or a vigilante.

The judge, though plainly mad at the prosecutor, did not immediately rule on the request. On Thursday, he pressed ahead with the case and said it would be ideal if the trial were to conclude on Friday. “If I would have let Mr. Rosenbaum take my firearm from me, he would have used it and killed me with it,” he said, “and probably killed more people.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

an American spectacle....

It's just so strange that a George Floyd connected BLM activist releasing a video implying the threat to identify jurors and the judge addressing the allegation that jurors were being videotaped while being transported to court in court isn't a bigger story.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Drone video at Rittenhouse murder trial shows first shootingA drone video was played in the Rittenhouse murder trial as the prosecution’s case appeared to be winding down after a week of testimony in which some of its own witnesses often bolstered Rittenhouse’s claim of self-defence Rittenhouse is most likely going to get off on the 1st and 3rd dude he shot. He'll probably get off on the 2nd but well see. he brought a rifle across state lines. he shouldn't have been anywhere near there to begin with.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Did state's own witnesses hurt Rittenhouse case?Prosecutors wrapped up more than a week of testimony at Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial after calling more than a dozen witnesses -- some appearing to help the defense more than the prosecution. Yes - they all but said he acted in self defence. Anyone would have done the same thing. A gun was pointed at him so he shot them. Way she goes Should have been in bed instead of looking like a Hollywood version of the Taliban militia. This case shows how pathetic you, all the media outlets, are. That's why I cut the cord years ago.
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

CTV National News: Rittenhouse gives testimonyAccused killer Kyle Rittenhouse gave a self-defence testimony in court today. CTV's Joy Malbon reports. I've seen better acting in Brazzers videos... It’s not an accusation. He murdered two people and wounded another person. He didn’t provide medical assistance (though that’s why he said he was in another state, in violation of a curfew, to do). He’s guilty. He should serve life in prison with no chance of parole. Death penalty!
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »