Thought mandatory roadside breath-tests would be unconstitutional? Canadian judges say otherwise

  • 📰 nationalpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 49 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 80%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Thought mandatory roadside breath-tests would be unconstitutional? Canadian judges say otherwise — via drivingdotca autonews

“The salutary effects of the legislation are clear, and may become more apparent with the passage of time. It will increase detection and deterrence of drinking and driving and thereby decrease the loss of life, injury, property damage and overall social cost that it too frequently still causes.”

This means Canadian police are now able to pull over any driver at any time and conduct a mandatory roadside breath test. Refusing the test comes with the same extremely serious penalties as being charged with impaired driving, including an immediate driver’s licence suspension. But so far, judges in provincial courts have swiftly rejected arguments that this new law goes too far. This includes cases in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario and Nova Scotia.that has quickly become influential, Justice Krista Lynn Leszczynski ruled on a Charter challenge of a mandatory screening conducted near the city of Sarnia on Dec. 22, 2018 — just four days after the new law took effect.

In her ruling, Leszczynski accepted the Crown’s argument that suspicion-based testing lets too many impaired drivers slip through undetected “as a result of an officers’ general inability to reliably observe indicia that a driver had alcohol in their body during routine traffic stops.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Experts thought mandatory roadside breath-testing would be unconstitutional, but Canadian judges say otherwiseIt will soon be three years since Canada enacted a controversial law that allows police to breath\u002Dtest any driver without needing suspicion of drinking — a law…
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »

Court finds Ottawa’s anti-abortion test for summer jobs funding within boundsA Federal Court judge says Ottawa is within bounds to require applicants seeking summer jobs funding be supportive of abortion rights, dismissing a legal challenge from Toronto Right to Life You have to believe in tax payer funded abortion to be eligible for a summer jobs grant to hire kids to mow the lawn. Only in Canada 😂 And yet another federal judge caves to the Liberal Party agenda. Shocking. Glad to hear this. Freedom to control your own reproductive choices is critical to women. Groups that are against choice should not recieve tax dollars. The key word here is choice.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »