. Do they insinuate that the majority judges were as emotional, irrational and devoid of judicial integrity as Zuma’s supporters allege they were?
The minority, however, agreed that Zuma was indeed in contempt of court and that direct access ought to have been granted on an urgent basis. They conclude that the matter should be referred to the prosecuting authority “for a decision on whether to prosecute Mr Zuma for contempt of court”. Furthermore, why did Zuma or his legal representative not simply appear before the court to ask for a postponement in order to prepare properly? Experience has not shown the Zuma team to shy away from requesting postponements.
A court can rescind its own judgment and set aside an order that was erroneously sought or granted; or in the case of a “patent error”. Orders are rescinded, for example, when they were issued in the absence of a litigant who got lost and ended up in the wrong court; or when names or numbers in the order are accidentally wrong.
I put it to you that inspire of what you are saying: if the ConCourt ruled AGAINST IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAST YEAR OF THE 2018 PUBLIC SERVANTS WAGE DEAL, it is a clear sign of of captured courts. Already, it is more than a month since it sat for the case on 24th August: WHY?
Never knew I would be what I am today after so much suffering so I saw a post about your platform and I took a step to try if it’s going to work, you change my life and now I’m so much satisfied with my life now. I just want to share your good work Dennismayson7