After more than a year of legal battles, the Virginia Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the state to remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee on Richmond’s Monument Avenue that has been widely criticized as a symbol of racial injustice.... [+]
in Richmond, Virginia. Virginia state politics are in a state of upheaval, with Governor Ralph Northam, State Attorney General Mark Herring, both Democrats, and Republican Senate Majority Leader Tommy Norment involved with past uses associations with blackface and Lt. Governor Justin Fairfax, a Democrat, accused of sexual misconduct by two women. The state Supreme Court sided with the state in response to two lawsuits from residents trying to block the statue’s removal.
The plaintiffs argued that neither Gov. Ralph Northam nor the state’s General Assembly had the power to revoke an agreement that placed the statue on Monument Avenue in 1899.This is a breaking news story and will be updated.
History, right. Lets put a statue of a cell phone. The only thing humans will remember
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Virginia high court rules for teacher who won't use transgender students' pronounsThe Supreme Court of Virginia has upheld a lower court ruling that ordered the reinstatement of a northern Virginia gym teacher who said he won’t refer to transgender students by the pronouns they use. Please don't confuse a gym teacher with an actual teacher. It seems like he's going out of his way to be unkind. It takes just as much energy to be nice. SMH. Please cite which 'religious conviction' prevents Byron from being respectful to the students in his class.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Opinion | The Supreme Court kneecapped Roe v. Wade with its silenceWe now have a court that let a Texas law, which is clearly at odds with current Supreme Court case law, go into effect. It is hard to imagine this same court would have any compunction about overturning or disabling the current Roe and Casey framework. Time to expand the Supreme Court! Let's be clear this is not a champaign problem. People with money will still be able to get abortions. are you sure? how far are you willing to go to protect your right?
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
'Expand The Court!': Livid Americans Demand Action After SCOTUS Abortion RulingThe Supreme Court refused to block a restrictive new Texas law.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court declines to block Texas abortion lawJustices split, 5-4, as Chief Justice John Roberts joins the court’s liberals in dissent. Tax the churches asap. Dear Liberals, We don't get homes and healthcare, you don't get abortions. Enjoy your gentrified downtowns. Oh, and wrap it twice for safety 😉 RoeVWade Scotus AbortionBan neoliberalism If Congress does not legislate, women's rights will go back half a century. We MUST codify Roe v. Wade. This Court will explicitly overrule Roe v. Wade despite the fact that it's functionally overruled by Planned Parenthood v. Casey & Gonzales v. Carhart.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »