California court disqualifies private judge in Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt divorce

  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 37 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 92%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The 2nd District Court of Appeal agreed with Angelina Jolie that a private judge didn’t sufficiently disclose business relationships with Brad Pitt’s attorneys

MARK RALSTON/AFP/Getty Images

“Judge Ouderkirk’s ethical breach, considered together with the information disclosed concerning his recent professional relationships with Pitt’s counsel, might cause an objective person, aware of all the facts, reasonably to entertain a doubt as to the judge’s ability to be impartial. Disqualification is required,” the court ruled.The decision means that the custody fight over the couple’s five minor children, which was nearing an end, could be starting over.

“If you’re going to play the role of a paid private judge you have to play by the rules and the rules are very clear, they require full transparency,” Jolie’s attorney Robert Olson said. “Matters that should have been disclosed were not disclosed.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Gentlemen, this is exactly the reason you don’t date western woman. They don’t know how to stand by your side and remain quiet.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Judge issues reasons for rejecting new evidence in Meng Wanzhou’s extradition caseWhile the documents would ‘no doubt be valuable to Meng in a trial,’ the judge says, they don’t expressly state Meng’s conclusion, which can only be reached through inferences
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Douglas Todd: Foreign buyers tax not racist, judges sayOpinion: B.C. court ruling should end political fears in Ottawa about acting on foreign ownership I think this article is wrong to compare the federal idea of a 1% annual property to the ndp one time 20% tax and assert the former is 'weaker' what? it seems as if everything is racist now so why not that tax? It seems like it is… this country was built by foreigners/immigrants
Source: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Read more »