, which upheld two restrictive Arizona laws and will limit the ability to challenge voting restrictions in court.
Though laws and rules already in place wouldn’t be subject to a retooled Voting Rights Act, future ones would. “If you look at the sea change in the politics, it all stems from Shelby and the political opportunity that it offers,” Hewitt said. They also point blame at Democrats, who in 2019 rejected a bipartisan bill to reestablish preclearance. Many Democrats instead favored their own measure, which would have eschewed the use of minority voter turnout data, a pillar of the original Voting Rights Act, while leaning heavily on looser standards, such as using the number of legal settlements and consent decrees issued in voting rights cases, to pull places into preclearance.
Canada in final stages of transition from socialism to communism
Do you want to start AlwaysMine Cloud mining in your smartphone? so download the app now .use my invitation cod and earn 10$ instantly invitation cod: hasi
might be an argument for increasing the number of justices in SCOTUS
Supreme political court caused this problem to begin with
Show your id at a polling site, that’s it. Anything else is fraud, see 2020 election
It shouldn’t be this hard….if reps are really for the people, they should pass this legislation
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »