In her decision, the judge cited the “inconsistencies and contradictions” in the statements of the Makati policeman, a member of the station drug enforcement unit who had acted as a poseur-buyer during an entrapment operation in 2019.Palamos also noted the absence of an elected public official and a representative from the Department of Justice during the inventory of the evidence against the accused, as required under Section 21 of RA 9165.
The case against Loonie was originally filed in Branch 149, before going to Branch 141 and Branch 150. “God knows we never sold drugs. Those shown in the media last September 2019 were all planted. It was an inhumane setup,” Idyll said.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »