Supreme Court sides with teen in speech case over Snapchat outburst

  • 📰 politico
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 65 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 29%
  • Publisher: 59%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of a Pennsylvania high school student who was suspended from the cheerleading program over a profane Snapchat post lamenting being denied a spot on the varsity squad

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of a Pennsylvania high school student who was suspended from the cheerleading program over a profane Snapchat post lamenting being denied a spot on the varsity squad.found that the First Amendment imposes broad limits on public schools’ ability to regulate off-campus speech delivered via social media, but the high court left the door open to educators regulating messages that are highly disruptive to school operations.

“We can find no evidence in the record of the sort of ‘substantial disruption’ of a school activity or a threatened harm to the rights of others that might justify the school’s action,” Breyer wrote. “Rather, the record shows that discussion of the matter took, at most, 5 to 10 minutes of an Algebra class ‘for just a couple of days’ and that some members of the cheerleading team were ‘upset’ about the content of [Levy’s] Snapchats.

The Bill Clinton appointee included on that list: ”serious or severe bullying or harassment targeting particular individuals; threats aimed at teachers or other students; the failure to follow rules concerning lessons, the writing of papers, the use of computers, or participation in other online school activities; and breaches of school security devices, including material maintained within school computers.

“It’s so important to their lives,” Kavanaugh said. “Coaches sweat the cuts, and it guts coaches to have to cut kids who are on the bubble. … A year suspension just seems excessive to me.”colored the court’s judgment. Alito’s opinion repeatedly inveighed against granting schools permission to impose a “heckler’s veto,” by invoking the hurt feelings of other students to justify punishing speech on or off campus.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 381. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

100 years of LGBTQ firsts: Breakthroughs from the tennis court to the Supreme CourtFrom the first U.S. Supreme Court ruling to address homosexuality to the first bisexual 'Bachelorette,' here are 10 historic LGBTQ milestones from around the world. Yeah, the bi batch rocked my gay world.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court Upholds High Schooler's Right To Send Expletive-Filled SnapchatIn 'Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.,' the Supreme Court set limits on what speech schools can — and can't — regulate online.
Source: HuffPostParents - 🏆 414. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court sides with high school cheerleader who cursed onlineThe Supreme Court ruled in favor of a former high school cheerleader who argued that she could not be punished by her public school for posting a profanity-laced caption on Snapchat when she was off school grounds. We are looking for the good samalitans to help the need here in Africa_Uganda. EveryLifeMatters. This is America. Free speech is for all of us wherever we want to express it. Or does only apply to liberals? Clarence Thomas mentions the mall in his lone dissent. What is this, the 80s? Do kids even hang out at the few malls left?
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court rules against NCAA caps on student-athlete education-related gifts and benefitsThe Supreme Court ruled unanimously against the NCAA in a major case involving whether it violates anti-trust law by capping what student athletes can receive by way of education-related gifts and benefits. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion. Would you be happy if you could complete your dental treatment in a few days of hospitalization? I am glad. Thank you, future dentist For all those who are new to this working from home Bitcoin trading options Here's a little tip: Get a trusted Bitcoin expert and stick to him RonelMoses32 Invest and play at similar times each day. Because : In times of chaos, your investment is your anchor to success⚖️ This global 'scholarship student' system should be reviewed or abolished. This is for young people living in an equal society.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Biden to replace FHFA director after Supreme Court rulingPresident Biden plans to quickly replace the regulator of U.S. mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — currently a Trump appointee — after a Supreme Court ruling gave him greater authority to fire the official
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court Rules Against NCAA In Student Athlete Compensation CaseThe Supreme Court has decided unanimously against the NCAA limiting compensation to student athletes, ruling it a violation of antitrust laws and allowing schools to offer athletes unlimited compensation as long as it’s connected to education. What do you think? I think they need to at least give them a allowance. It’s rough being in college with no money in your pocket. And as much as they make for these colleges. They should not have to work. Concentration should be on their studies and being a good athlete.
Source: TheOnion - 🏆 724. / 51 Read more »