The case doesn't decide whether students can be paid salaries. Instead, the ruling will help determine whether schools decide to offer athletes tens of thousands of dollars in those benefits for things including tutoring, study abroad and internships.
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the court that the NCAA sought “immunity from the normal operation of the antitrust laws,” which the court declined to grant. But the former athletes who brought the case, including former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston, argued that the NCAA's rules on education-related compensation were unfair and violate federal antitrust law designed to promote competition. The Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling barring the NCAA from enforcing those rules.
NCAA is a license to make money. Its executives make millions each year in salaries and bonuses. The organization makes billions in exploiting athletes for profit. The big business rewards coaches who make ridiculous salaries as schools use athletes to solicit alumni $
Long term solution is to have a hard divide between higher education and sports. Create new sports leagues. Athletes get paid market rates for their labor (with lifetime insurance policies). Colleges can sponsor teams, but there is no inherent connection.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »