Monday, 03 May 2021 07:18 AM MYT
Apple has mostly succeeded in staying out of the regulatory crosshairs by arguing that the iPhone is a niche product in a smartphone world dominated by Google’s Android operating system. But that argument has become harder to sustain with the number of iPhone users now exceeding 1 billion. For example, in arguing that iPhones are a software market unto themselves, Epic relies partly on a 1992 US Supreme Court decision that rejected efforts by Kodak to force owners of its copying machines to use Kodak repair services.
“If you obtained a monopoly legitimately, you’re allowed to charge high prices,” said Randal Picker, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School. A federal antitrust official, speaking anonymously because the official was not authorised to speak to the media, said that an Epic loss would dim the chances of the government pursuing a similar lawsuit against Apple.Epic’s suit has ramped up pressure on Apple in the court of public opinion at a time when the iPhone maker’s business practices are facing fresh scrutiny around the world.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: malaymail - 🏆 1. / 86 Read more »
Source: fmtoday - 🏆 5. / 72 Read more »
Source: staronline - 🏆 4. / 75 Read more »