Unusual Supreme Court Majority Rules in Favor of Guatemalan Who Entered U.S. Illegally

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 50 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Thousands of noncitizens could avoid deportation after the Supreme Court ruled that federal agencies failed to properly notify individuals about the time and place of removal proceedings

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court opened a door Thursday that could let thousands of noncitizens avoid deportation, ruling 6-3 that federal agencies failed to properly notify individuals about the time and place of removal proceedings.: Conservatives who focus on legislative text—Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett—joined liberals Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who tend to read ambiguous provisions in immigrants’ favor.

The case marked the second time in three years the court found the government failed to follow deportation procedures set forth in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. The law states that the government must serve “a notice to appear” with essential details on individuals it seeks to deport. “These include the nature of the proceedings against the alien, the legal authority for the proceedings, the charges against the alien, the fact that the alien may be represented by counsel, the time and place at which the proceedings will be held, and the consequences of failing to appear,” Justice Gorsuch wrote.

The last element carried particular significance, because noncitizens with clean records who demonstrate continued presence for a specified period, typically 10 years, can qualify to remain in the U.S. if deportation would cause hardship to their children or other relatives who are American citizens or lawful residents.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

So federal agencies can now purposely “fail” to do its duty and effectively eliminate any deportation action?

Jay rohere iv I suspect& his africans had burned down the Notre Dame Cathedral & 3 Churches in El Paso. He has been paid by English Vendetta to kill our family for being pro constitutionalists; he's blaming our innocent family for France's tragedy. Please do not let him do this.

🏛

Always bet on the incompetence of government. That is why I don’t understand either side of the political atmosphere .

A WIN for IMMIGRATION! 🎆

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court sides with undocumented immigrant fighting deportationThe Supreme Court on Thursday sided with an undocumented Guatemalan immigrant seeking to challenge his removal from the US by immigration authorities. Do you think this is what people really need right now? That one time Democrats accused an innocent man (Kavanaugh) of sexual assault reminds me of all the times Democrat slave owners would accuse black men of sexual assault of their wives or daughters. Same party different year. rooting for injuries
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Potential future Biden Supreme Court pick set for U.S. Senate hearingA federal judge considered a possible future U.S. Supreme Court nominee is set to testify on Wednesday at a Senate confirmation hearing for her selection by President Joe Biden to serve on an influential appeals court.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court justices debate cheerleader's free speech caseU.S. Supreme Court justices heard arguments on Wednesday on whether public schools can punish students for what they say off campus in a case involving a former Pennsylvania cheerleader's foul-mouthed social media post that could impact the free speech rights of millions of young Americans. Free speech should apply to everyone everywhere Umm... She bad mouthed her school and was cut from the squad. How is this a First Amendment violation? Looks like natural consequences to me. She wasn’t imprisoned and her civil rights weren’t violated. Cheerleading, last time I checked, isn’t a civil right. What am I missing?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »