US Supreme Court justices on Wednesday wrestled with whether public schools can punish students for what they say off campus in a case involving a former Pennsylvania cheerleader's foul-mouthed social media post that could impact the free speech rights of millions of young Americans.
Questions by conservative and liberal justices, however, indicated that they were concerned about protecting wide-ranging student expression, including contentious political or religious views, while at the same time allowing schools to address threats, bullying and other difficult situations that could arise outside the school environment itself.
The American Civil Liberties Union, representing Levy, has argued that students need protection from censorship and monitoring of their beliefs. But the justices struggled over the broader free speech issues raised by the case. Several justices raised hypothetical scenarios that showed their concerns over protecting student expression, including if a student wears a Black Lives Matter T-shirt, carries a Confederate flag or refuses to call transgender students by the names they have adopted.
On a Saturday while at a convenience store in Mahanoy City in Pennsylvania's coal region, she posted a photo of her and a friend raising their middle fingers, adding a caption using the same curse word four times to voice her displeasure with cheerleading, softball, school and"everything."Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh said it appeared to him that kicking her off the team for a year was"a bit of an over-reaction by the coach.
I’m back with smile on my face again thanks to MALYAROVALARA_ I don’t know what to say.... you’re the reason behind my successful trade life!! God bless you for your good works
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
US Supreme Court to hear major case on carrying handguns in publicThe US Supreme Court stepped back into the heated debate over gun rights on Monday, agreeing to hear a challenge backed by the National Rifle Association to New York state's restrictions on people carrying concealed handguns in public. Having your readers stare down the barrel of a gun distracts from the story & causes anxiety, stirring up deep seated fear for those who have experienced gun violence - won’t you please consider not glorifying guns?
Source: SowetanLIVE - 🏆 13. / 63 Read more »
Source: ewnupdates - 🏆 30. / 53 Read more »
US Supreme Court to hear major case on carrying handguns in publicThe US Supreme Court stepped back into the heated debate over gun rights on Monday, agreeing to hear a challenge backed by the National Rifle Association to New York state's restrictions on people carrying concealed handguns in public. It is not guns that kill people, its people! License people to carry guns. National Rifle Association wll obviously want to protect gun owners. This, in the face of many shootings occurring over thr. Just because the Supreme Court grants them a hearing, doesn't mean gun laws have to be relaxed further. They have hogged many headlines it Is too much nw.
Source: TimesLIVE - 🏆 28. / 59 Read more »
US Supreme Court takes up major challenge to abortion rightsThe US Supreme Court on Monday agreed to consider gutting the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalised abortion nationwide, taking up Mississippi's bid to revive a Republican-backed state law that bans the procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy. I day to you sir I really appreciate your efforts on my second withdraw you're the best Jamiehenycutt
Source: TimesLIVE - 🏆 28. / 59 Read more »