Patrick T. Fallon for The Washington Post / via Getty ImagesThe Supreme Court on Monday takes up an appeal from two conservative groups that don't want to tell state regulators the names of their biggest donors.
The two groups are challenging a law requiring charities to file reports every year, including a copy of an IRS document listing the names and addresses of their top contributors. The state gathers the information to help detect the use of charities to commit financial fraud.
NO MORE DARK MONEY, DAMNIT!
Wonder why he doesn't want to reveal who the are? Are his 2 biggest donors Russia and China?
I see nothing wrong with following the money for any/all parties.
Reveal. Expose to sunlight.
If you have to hide them, you shouldn’t take money from them.
Free speech means saying things openly Not cowered behind a veil as they want to use these companies to do the dirty work Say it openly. Freely If you feel you need to hide it then do you really believe what your money is saying?
Foreign donors perhaps?
How about making the guy running for office just pay for everything out of his own pocket
Gee....Why?
Shouldn't have to reveal the names
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
The Supreme Court on the DocketWith Democrats pushing proposals to reshape the Supreme Court and Republicans opposing them, here are answers to the what, why and how of some of the changes being considered for the high court. ¡Hola! Estoy usando la aplicación WhatsAuto. If you ask Republicans about their ideas they say they are a ‘Big Tent’ and embrace many ideas The truth is WE will never tolerate the ideas of fascists, racists, bigots, violent extremists, QAnon nutcases or radicalized Christian lunatics putting the Bible over the Constitution Shouldn’t be allowed.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court to take up right to carry gun for self-defenseThe Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal to expand gun rights in the United States in a New York case over the right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense melancholy for childhood westerns It's boring to sit at home alone, looking for someone to spend time with So the Conservative-stacked Supreme Court could rule that one can carry a concealed firearm in New York? Hey TheDemocrats, you might want to ExpandTheCourt now ... potus VP SenSchumer SpeakerPelosi SenGillibrand RepMaloney RepAOC RitchieTorres RepMondaire
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court to take up right to carry gun for self-defenseWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear an appeal to expand gun rights in the United States in a New York case over the right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense. The case marks the court’s first foray into gun rights since Justice Amy Coney Barrett came on board in October, making a 6-3 conservative majority. The justices said Monday they will review a lower-court ruling that upheld New York’s restrictive gun permit law. The court's action follows mass shootings in recent weeks in Indiana , Georgia , Colorado and California . Very good, we all know what the ruling will say 🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️ nice
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court agrees to take up major Second Amendment caseThe Supreme Court announced Monday it will consider the scope of the Second Amendment next term in a case concerning a New York law that restricts an individual from carrying a concealed handgun in public. Outlaw all guns! I’m almost certain this particular court will vote for the unrestricted carrying of concealed firearms everywhere Open embassies to do interviews DV2021 DV2020 KCC SaveDiversityVisa diversity_visa potus VP StateDept AliMayorkas DHSgov SecBlinken TravelGov USEmbassyCairo washingtonpost FoxNews
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court to Hear Major Gun CaseThe Supreme Court agreed to review a New York law that limits carrying concealed firearms outside the home, potentially loosening gun laws nationwide in the first major Second Amendment case since 2010. “Expansion” lmao Guns are for assholes. This is just more proof. 🏛
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court to take up right to carry gun for self-defenseThe Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear an appeal to expand gun rights in the United States in a New York case over the right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense. The case marks the court’s first foray into gun rights since Justice Amy Coney Barrett came on board in October, making a 6-3 conservative majority. The justices said Monday they will review a lower-court ruling that upheld New York’s restrictive gun permit law. So I wonder if she thinks NYers should be sashaying around with guns strapped all over them as they buy a bagel and coffee. I like the doom clouds over SCOTUS. Feels about right. Repeal and replace the Second Amendment.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »