Sourcing From China May Become Tougher Than Ever

  • 📰 Forbes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 88 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 39%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

On March 1st, 2021, a U. S. court ruling called into question the viability of “first sale” for goods imported from China and Vietnam.

2021, a U.S. court ruling called into question the viability of “first sale” for goods imported from China and Vietnam. This ruling, if not reversed on appeal, could increase duty imposed on goods coming from the two countries by 10 to 15%. That could be a major negative factor for apparel and footwear importers. They have an estimated annual value of “first sale” products of more than $5 billion.

What is a “first sale”? “First sale” enables importers to reduce dutiable value of their products by using the “first sale” price as the one on which duties are assessed upon entry into the United States. It is as if the goods came directly from the manufacturer, rather than the “second sale” price that includes the markup by the middleman. In other words, if the duty for a particular product is 15%, and you import $8 Million of the product, import taxes of $1.

Both apparel and textile companies try to avoid trade uncertainties, and they use “first sale” as an option to manage expenses. Nicole Bivens Collinson, president, International Trade and Government Relations at Sandler Travis and Rosenberg, P.A., suggests that companies can save 12 to 20 percent of owed duties. She says that every first sale program is tailored to meet the needs of the importer.

The March 1 court ruling is now on appeal. The U.S. Court of International Trade decision in Meyer Corp. vs. United States imperils the use of “first sale” and would increase customs duty on many products. It is obvious that importers want to mitigate the risk of additional duties. It may be necessary to avoid the use of a middle man. As it stands today, the process has three key steps.

A ruling on the “first sale” policy has significant implications for goods coming from countries classified as ‘a non-market economy’. In a non-market economy , non-market influences could result in an artificial depression of prices for any number of reasons. For instance, the production of cotton is subsidized, or factories take a government payment to employ certain workers and/or because polyester manufacturers don’t have to pay market rates for rent or utilities.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Is it possible to find a good guy on Twitter?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 394. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Analysis: China may just have doomed its trade deal with EuropeChina and the European Union rang in the new year by striking a major investment deal intended to strengthen their trade ties. A contentious spat over human rights could now doom the agreement.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

China may test its digital currency with foreign visitors at the 2022 Beijing Winter OlympicsA trial with foreign visitors at the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics would be the first test for China's digital yuan with international users. No ones going tho lmfao! Unless they open their capital controls their currency won’t matter. If they do open up, all their wealth will come to the US. Either way, US wins Planet Earth: Be prepared to be fleeced.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »