Yet it is also, for the time being, only a symbolic one. The three-judge panel declared that preventing the couples from marrying contradicted Article 14 of the constitution, which forbids discrimination on the basis of race, creed, sex, social status or family origin. Yet it also refused to award damages to the plaintiffs, arguing that public opinion was evolving quickly, and that the government should be given time to legislate on the matter.
The plaintiffs say they will appeal against the refusal of compensation. In the meantime, campaigners plan to use the lower court’s finding to bolster suits in other cities. More favourable rulings could increase pressure on parliament to act.
U have a declining population and now this. Japanese women are very beautiful anyway
Why can’t they have their dirty sex in private, don’t rub it on us all the time and everywhere, we don’t like listening or seeing your nonsense cauz it is 🤮
This is totally unacceptable.
The America-made Japanese constitution wrote: the marriage is formed by one man and one woman.
is d moral bankruptcy of d debauched deviants a benefit
Japan doesn’t have the homeless problem, nor rampant drug abuse. They don’t suffer from mass-shootings. The population values personal responsibility. Young students Clean their own schools. Maybe we should BUTT OUT & work our own issues. 🤔
I mean if they wanna then let them but yall sumbitches telling me to call you a women with a '4 to '8 inch clit then fuckkk that
wow
The best choice I've made this year was investing in cryptocurrency and forex trading and earning from home. With the help of Kellybrian_ I've been earning $ 23k weekly I've never regretted this decision. 🙏🏻🙏🏻