The Supreme Court has just gutted the Crown's duty to consult First Nations - Macleans.ca

  • 📰 macleans
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 71%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Opinion: The newly released Mikisew decision creates easy backdoor for governments to once again run roughshod over Indigenous rights

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Southbird85 Why would an unelected special interest group need to be consulted ?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 19. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

LIVE UPDATES: Supreme Court rules ministers do not have to consult First Nations when drafting lawsThe federal government does not have to consult Indigenous communities when drafting new legislation, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled, dismissing the appeal of the Mikisew Cree First Nation. OMG! Common sense from the SCOC? This is strange. I wonder how the different parties who will be directly affected by this decision are going to react Just like Sir John A. McDonald; take what you want from those who were here before us, pretend or even lie to make them believe that this is in their best interest and if they don`t abide by your laws, remove them , displace them, take their children away and rape their women !
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

Supreme Court rules ministers do not have to consult First Nations when drafting lawsThe federal government does not have to consult Indigenous communities when drafting new legislation, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled, dismissing the appeal of the Mikisew Cree First Nation. rachaiello This will not stand. :-)
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

The Supreme Court’s duty to consult ruling will create immense uncertaintyIf judges are not willing to make the decisions their role requires, the rule of law suffers and Canada suffers GlobeDebate Guess what? We all live with uncertainty. We learn to deal with it. GlobeDebate I wonder if the average Canadian can name a single judge in Canada’s Supreme Court. I bet Canadians can name a USA judge ! GlobeDebate The crown has no honour, it never did. This concept must die.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

No duty to consult Indigenous groups on federal law-making, Supreme Court saysA majority of the high court said the law-making process does not amount to Crown conduct that triggers the deeply entrenched duty to confer with Indigenous Peoples
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »

Talk to my former Supreme Court judge - Macleans.caRetired Supremes are getting busy in their post-work years—see the SNC-Lavalin case—and it is raising concerns We should always respect and honor the experience which they possess, they have been in the system and they have seen it all done first hand. We should listen with a sincere devotion, if we really want to learn.
Source: macleans - 🏆 19. / 71 Read more »

Another investigation nixed as Liberals reject Supreme Court leak review - Macleans.caPolitics Insider for April 12: Philpott gets a ruling (sort of), Tory tax tip troubles and why the refugee rule changes are hitting Trudeau's brand
Source: macleans - 🏆 19. / 71 Read more »

Supreme Court leaks become a gusher - Macleans.caPolitics Insider for March 27: Supreme Court leak backlash, the ethics committee takes a pass, and canola wars heat up JWR is really out to damage the Trudeau brand.. She should resign from caucus already cdnpoli Don't t forget the 2014 leak , 6 candidates, Harper You mean the media's faux backlash.
Source: macleans - 🏆 19. / 71 Read more »