The suit against Uber was first filed in a British employment tribunal by Yaseen Aslam and James Farrar in 2016 when the two men were driving for Uber. Aslam used to work for another company, but said he was lured to Uber by lucrative pay and bonuses.But Aslam claimed the perks quickly dried up as more drivers joined the platform, resulting in fewer rides and lower fares. The pair of drivers prevailed in the employment tribunal and then in two subsequent appeals by the company.
"I am overjoyed and greatly relieved by this decision, which will bring relief to so many workers in the gig economy who so desperately need it. During the six years of these proceedings, we have watched the government commission and then shelve a review of the gig economy yet do nothing to help us," Aslam said in a statement on Friday.
The case now goes back to the employment tribunal, which could order Uber to pay compensation to about 20 original claimants. Thousands of other drivers have taken legal action against Uber, and the decision could be quickly applied to them. Drivers who used the platform at the time of the suit may also be eligible to make a claim for compensation.
Ouch ! That hurts !
Right decision 👌🏼
Have you ever lost a ridiculous amount of money to bitcoin investment/mining & wish you never even tried it in the first place. contact Mrs kimjmasonf for help. She has helped me & many other's recovered more than what we've lost in a short period so i decided to share the news
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Source: SBSNews - 🏆 3. / 89 Read more »