Unless the receiver of the ring helped pay for it, etiquette dictates that one should return it to the giver. Side note, both parties are nuts.
Lawyers in Love
The buyer, unless on credit/hp in which case the credit card company
The man because he paid for it. If it was a gift for Christmas or birthday. A combined gift no problem. But he is still paying for the ring
The provider
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
This D.C. lawyer is suing his former girlfriend for the return of a $100,000 engagement ringThis soap opera of a lawsuit will remind you that you can't put a price on love... but you can put a price on the breakup. She absolutely ought to return the ring if they never got married. Quantanamo In my culture, if a guy breaks it then the woman keeps it and vice versa if the woman breaks it. Duke. It’s always Duke.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
A D.C. lawyer is suing his former girlfriend for the return of a $100,000 engagement ringRyan Strasser alleges that his former girlfriend insisted that his original budget of $40,000 was not enough. shouldn’t be though. every state should view it as conditional. i don’t see a debate If you’re stupid enough to spend $100,000 on an engagement ring, you don’t deserve that money. Not really! The woman owns the engagement ring - one would say that it is for the period of courting before marriage, hence the period spent in courting is given as a token for the courtship. The wedding ring should be returned instead. Well you don't have to agree with me. :(
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »