Supreme Court nominee keeps mum on transfer of power, other key issues

  • 📰 smh
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 34 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 80%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Donald Trump's pick, Amy Coney Barrett, did however say she gave no commitments to the White House on how she would rule.

US President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, says she gave no commitments to the White House on how she would rule on Obamacare or election-related cases and declined to say if she believed landmark rulings legalising abortion and gay marriage were properly decided.Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing

on Tuesday , Barrett repeatedly declined to give her personal views, or to preview how she might rule, on key issues that could become before the court. Like other Supreme Court nominees before her, she said she was prohibited from expressing those opinions by the “canons of judicial conduct”.

"Republicans are scrambling to confirm this nominee as fast as possible because they need one more Trump judge on the bench before November 10 to win and strike down the entire Affordable Care Act," said Harris, a Judiciary Committee member. Barrett said no one at the White House sought a commitment from her on how she would rule on that or any other issue.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

She has mad eyes.

Trump’s nominee.

That would be in the US, right❓Praps make clear.

kuku27 She has excellent track record, what stops her from speaking. Could it be strings attached or some kind of pressure working. The situation is sensitive, it needs an answer

Another horrid stepping stone in the Decline and Fall of the USofA!

Amy seemed like a promising candidate. I don’t like hate crime and intimidation and bullying. Sadly, she hasn’t answered some of the questions correctly.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court confirmation hearings begin for Judge Amy Barrett | Sky News AustraliaJudge Amy Coney Barrett has defended her conservative background as the Senate Judiciary Committee votes to confirm her nomination to the Supreme Court. \n\nMs Barrett delivered a statement on the hearing's first day, saying she was honoured and humbled by President Trump's pick and hopes to live up to her predecessor's legacy.\n\nThe hearing will last for four days as Republicans and Democrats debate her nomination. \n\nDemocrats have strongly opposed President Trump's selection, which if confirmed by the Senate would give the court a conservative majority.\n\nRepublicans have backed Mr Trump's choice, praising her as a 'thoughtful' judge with 'impeccable' credentials. Look at this picture. President Trump admires and respects Mrs.Barrett. Good luck to her! Help spread the campaign this girl who suffers from femur cancer GOD bless you Yeshua Jesus Christ take care of you BarbaraNogueraA DalilaSayegh MarioHakunam john VctorSa02761991 SorangelN Dcarmencitavccv SoyGabyMirabal Bruce_wayne_67
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

Protesters rally as confirmation hearings begin for US Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney BarrettJudge Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump's pick to fill a key vacancy on the Supreme Court bench, faced the Senate's scrutiny on Monday as confirmation hearings kicked off for the lifetime appointment. The mere fact that she accepted the nomination means she is not fit for that office as it shows she does not possess the integrity and respect for rule of law required of a Supreme Court justice. The left aren't going to pay someone to say she raped them when she was 15?
Source: SBSNews - 🏆 3. / 89 Read more »

'This is a sham': Democrats, Republicans spar at Supreme Court hearingDemocrats on the Senate committee argue that Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett is 'a judicial torpedo' aimed at abortion, gay marriage, Obamacare. Why do Australians care about Amy Coney? Isn't focusing your writers on Australia a better idea? Get one of your writers to watch 'A Life on this Planet' and evaluate Australia's economic policy based on its recommendations for saving this planet. Except she’s said 100 times she’s not.
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »

'This is a sham': Democrats, Republicans spar at Supreme Court hearingDemocrats on the Senate committee argue that Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett is 'a judicial torpedo' aimed at abortion, gay marriage and Obamacare.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »

US Supreme Court: Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation hearing opens to replace Ruth Bader GinsburgAmy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearing has begun as the Republican-led Senate charged ahead to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. 9News NoJustice4SSRNoVote Justice For Sushant Singh Rajput 🙏 We are begging justice...please don't play with our Emotions. PMOIndia narendramodi AmitShah
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court nominee Amy Barrett interrogated in Senate Hearings | Sky News AustraliaPresident Trump's Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett has been interrogated on the second day of her Senate Hearing over her stance on key socio-political issues. \n\nJudge Barrett declined to say whether she believes the ruling which legalised abortion was appropriately decided.\n\nShe insisted her Catholic background would not impact her decisions as a Justice on the Supreme Court. \n\nThe panel's top Democrat - Senator Dianne Feinstein - said it was 'disturbing' Ms Barrett would not give a direct answer. \n\nDemocratic lawmakers who opposed her nomination also questioned the Judge on how she might rule on a case aimed at dismantling Obamacare. \n\nJudge Barrett said she has made no commitments to the President regarding any future ruling.\n realDonaldTrump 'Interrogated'. Murdoch's sycophants at Sky are pathetic as usual. Apparently they'd like no questioning of her and expect her to be serving their agenda this afternoon. The cult that the creepy Handmaiden belongs to... realDonaldTrump realDonaldTrump to avoid these procedures in Uruguay's Judicial Power, in particular the Constitutional mandate[Art.239]:'TO INVESTIGATE WITHOUT DISTINCTION', Corrupt politicians, with the support of:Obama,Biden, Clinton& Kerry,resorted to a GolpeDeEstadoTecnico.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »