What does it mean to 'pack' the Supreme Court? Has it been done before?

  • 📰 ABC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 48 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The idea of adding more justices -- or what critics call 'packing' the court to secure a desired majority -- is not unprecedented but has taken on new life.

The idea of adding more justices to the Supreme Court or"packing" the court resurfaced after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died in September.

Seventh U.S. Circuit Court Judge Amy Coney Barrett speaks after President Donald Trump announced that she will be his nominee to the Supreme Court in the Rose Garden at the White House, Sept. 26, 2020. Trump tapped Barrett to be his third Supreme Court nominee in just four years and to replace the late Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

George Washington nominated the original six justices on Sept. 24, 1789, after Congress passed the Judiciary Act of 1789 establishing a Supreme Court. For the next eighty years, theIn 1801, President John Adams and a Federalist Congress reduced the Court to five Justices in an attempt to limit any nominations available to incoming President Thomas Jefferson.

After President Ulysses S. Grant was elected in 1868, Congress set the number at nine, where it has stayed ever since. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the 32nd President of the United States from 1933-45 works at his desk, circa 1936.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

It should always be a equal amount of republicans and democrats on the Supreme Court. This will end the issue of having more of one party. As long as they don’t let their beliefs affect fair justice.

That was Maduro did in Venezuela...

STOP TRYING THE CHANGE THE RULES JUST BECAUSE YOU LOST THE ELECTION.

Do we really want a Supreme Court justice who is willing to accept a nomination that was made for the sole purpose of stealing an election and taking away healthcare.Where is the morality and religious values in these actions.

I am not opposed to adding seats and I am not opposed to a term limit for judges. I do not believe they need to be in that seat indefinitely.

Like the emails

You lost me at “critics” WTF with this critics bullshit.

This is not 'We the People' Essential Workers left out-America needs help

It may be that realDonaldTrump will work with a new Congress that actually represents the lower classes of people instead of moneyed elites and increase the court to 13, four trump like non- lawyers of regular citizens from working class America.

Clear example of how this process usurps the fallacious premise of separation of powers in the US constitution.

Yes it has been done that’s why we don’t have only 5 justices, and the end result was term limited for the president and that is why they only have 2 terms,

Because the left will do anything to remain in power at all costs

Increasing the number is not packing. It's expanding.

I say Term Limit! Noone in America should serve a lifetime

Only since 1869 no biggie...

You can’t win by always changing the rules... once a loser always a loser...

America deserves a representative court. Republicsns have court-packed for decades. Time to unpack and create a balanced SCOTUS. I like the idea of having two or three dozen justices with a random set of 7 or 9 assigned to any particular case.

What did RBG think about it?

This would ruin the separation of powers and checks and balances in our government.

Dictators pack their court all the time!

Expand the court!

What am I not understanding? It sounds to me like that is what the Republican Senate is trying to do!

Well the Republicans want to play dirty fairisfair

161 Lexington ave Manhattan nythere all informants and agents x miltary and there snitchn on the gangs and cartels put me n danger. rm 1214

It’s being done right now.

Why not, it didn't seem to bother Republicans while stealing Judicial appointments. Now they will steal this nomination and not think twice about. They are only getting their panties in a bunch because they might lose the advantage they cheated to create!

Trump owes $400,000,000 to some unknown person(s), doesn't pay taxes, hasn't addressed BountyGate, issued a stand-by to a white supremacist group, is hiding his medical condition, won't commit to a peaceful transfer of power, but please tell us more about this.

So the Democrats pack the Court. Then next time Republicans in power, they reduce the number. Bottom line: the Court becomes another political branch like the other two. Today the Court looks after right of citizens as per. Constitution. Let’s keep it that way.

Moscow Mitch blocked every Judicial appointment from Obama for the last 2 years of his presidency. He has spent all of Trump's presidency packing the courts. Report on that.

Packing the court is not making it possibly lean more to the right or to the left.

IT'S EXACTLY WHAT TRUMP & 'TRUMP REPUBLICANS' ARE DOING NOW. A RECKONING OF THE HIGHEST ORDER UPON EACH ONE OF THEM & THEIR OWN FOR GENERATIONS TO COME !!!

It’s taken on new life because of the media. Biden should follow the Trump playbook and create a new scandal every day. Give the media something to chase.

Funny, how they keep talking about expanding the SCOTUS, gop must be really terrified of their election prospects.

The number of Supreme Court justices has remained the same since 1869. Justices and judge vacancies, at any level, are filled at the pleasure of the sitting President.

This is annoying and needs to be taken off put on the Internet if you want to watch this boring garbage it’s Depressing

Lol. Smoke and mirrors from wanna be dictator trump because he literally has nothing else to talk about.

Cover the real deal-that GOP stole MerrickGarland seat and are pushing thru another DURING an election. Happening now. Not some hypothetical.

Biden will do this, Biden will do that, Biden is like this, Biden is like that, Biden will try his best to run the country for the people not to get rich and steel from the people. Yes Biden will do something you cannot do. BIDEN WILL LISTEN TO WHAT IS BEST FOR THE PEOPLE. OK !

Journalists. You’re taking the bait. Republicans already packed the courts. Mitch laughed about it. Your job is not both sides. It’s the truth.

Who does Trump owe money to? Why has he paid so little in taxes? How are we going to move past COVID? What about evictions/foreclosures? How do we restore employment? A list of things more relevant and immediate than this garbage “story.”

Do better. NY times article ring a bell? The hypocrisy of the GOP trying to cram a Supreme Court nominee 23 days before the election? Trumps taxes, 210k Americans dead....

Hey , when can you run a story about Mitch McConnell delaying various judicial appointments under the Obama administration. Feels like that should also be part of the story if you are going to talk about court packing.

Amazing how lefties dummies do not even know what packing the supreme Court it. Cant fix stupid i guess!!! Its been 9 for 150 years BTW. 🤣🤣

The republican ran senate lead by Mitch mcconnell has been doing it for years now all of a sudden it's a concern. It's a republican talking point it's shouldn't even be news.

Haha not for 150 years it hasn't dummies 🤣🤣

It's not packing it's expanding to give room for various opinions

McConnell has been packing the federal court for four years, so whatever. I love how Republicans can completely change their stance, ignore norms and traditions, then expect Democrats not to do the same thing.

The entire issue goes away if the Republicans would wait until after the election to confirm a justice.

How about you focus on the things Trump and Mcconnell have ACTUALLY done to the courts instead of hypothetical things that might happen under Biden. Hold those in power to account. Do your job.

Give me a break. What about the hypocrisy!

It's stayed the same for 150 years for good reason. Keep it the same. Otherwise you could have a court dozens and dozens eventually.

This is a half-right definition that aids the full-on campaign to change the definition from adding new seats to dilute an existing court majority (as FDR tried) to appointing judges who you agree with politically. This allows the GOP to be accused of doing it when they have not.

It's been called court packing since 1930. Stop acting like this is a new thing.

STOP HELPING PUSH THIS FUCKING NARRATIVE MY GOD DID YOU IDIOTS LEARN NOTHING IN 2016

It means stacking the deck for predicted outcome come on this is not rocket science

You should explain that to Democrats they keep saying the Republicans are packing the courts and it’s making them look uneducated

Hasn’t been done in 150 years. That is unprecedented. CNNisTheEnemyOfThePeople

The President is filling a vacant seat that’s it. Does it happen to be conservative ? Yes, that’s the way it goes, as written in the constitution... the document democrats only use as a weapon versus, protecting its citizens. FillTheSeatNOW

Lol reporting it’s not unprecedented to pack the courts but it is unprecedented to appoint a justice in an election yr. 🤡

FDR tried to pack the Supreme Court during the Depression. It was a disaster ...

We don’t need more justice on the Supreme Court we just need people who are qualified, look at each case with an impartial view and makes an impartial judgment based on evidence and facts, not feelings, political view or pressure.

Yet the Republicans shrank the size of the court to 8 for a year because of politics. Where was all of the hand wringing then?

Wow. Just wow abc.

WOULD YOU SPEND MORE TIME ON TRUMPS CORRUPTION!!!

You feckless enablers. This isn’t even a story. Focus on real news like: 212,000 dead because of incompetent President; tax fraud by same; refusal of POTUS and VP to agree to peaceful transition of gov if they lose on Nov 3rd; R voter suppression, & etc.

What goes around comes around. GOP has been oblivious to simple truths for many years. But truth doesn't disappear!

Filling a vacant seat is NOT “packing” the court!!! Stop the stupidity

McConnell has been packing the court for 3 and a half years. Joe Biden should have add it for equal justice in America.

It has been called “court packing” for 80 years. It’s not “what critics call” it’s the term used in high school textbooks, ordinary conversation, and in political discourse in both parties.

There’s a clear strategy to continue to suppress voting, and the GOP will pave the way via the Courts. An American political Party whose only hope for survival is rooted in keeping eligible voters from exercising their rights. Pitiful.

MAGA-PHONE deflection....NON ISSUE....little trumpy scared

A dictatorship move...part of the Communist movement of the democratic party. The democrats must be disbanded and placed in federal prisons, hard time.

What's going on right now with Barrett is way more important than this b******* story

Dems will pack the Supreme Court because they’re tyrants, and we will descend into one party socialism, just like Venezuela. Think about that before you vote for these radicals

We should turn every American into a Supreme Court Justice. Let's really pack that court.

Doing what the constitution allows is not packing the court.

Only when you think your side will benefit.

Oh the media. Just terrible at this.

I think everyone should be fired..... on both sides

LOL “what critics call packing” Carry that Biden water, ABC

Enjoy..................

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 471. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Democrats, Facing Critical Supreme Court Battle, Worry Feinstein Is Not Up to TaskWhen Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee about to plunge into an election-season Supreme Court confirmation battle, was asked in the Capitol recently what her strategy would be for the coming fight, she walked by silently, an aide offering that she had a meeting Feinstein still never came clean of her hiring that CCP communist guy as her chaeffeur driver staffer guy for 20 years or so giving out secrets of america what she knew back when. She should have not run for reelection. She is not capable of fighting Fascism.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

How the Senate’s Rules Might Play Out in the Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court ConfirmationThe GOP-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee will begin holding confirmation hearings for Amy Coney Barrett on Monday. Here is a sampler of some of the procedural issues at play. Ahhhhhh the hypocrisy. Mothers should not take on a second career until the youngest child turns 16. Help us help you ! ....
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court nominee Barrett faces Senate testU.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett's Senate confirmation kicks off in earnest on Monday as Republicans seek to place her on the bench ahead of the presidential election next month in the face of blanket Democratic opposition. Even if she flies in on a broomstick the GOP will still vote her in! It’s disgraceful! What test?! Bloody farce. Rammed into SCOTUS by the feckless and corrupt Senate “Majority”.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Biden says voters don't deserve to know his stance on packing Supreme CourtDemocratic nominee Joe Biden on Friday said that voters don’t deserve to know if he would attempt to pack the Supreme Court if he wins in November and Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed to the high court. Did you hear that,ye all voters...awake now or never... Gees ... guess we don’t need to vote for him It's not just the court packing question. Joe Biden repeatedly has stated that people have the right to know before they vote. We know the President's pick. Where's the list Joe?
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Top Senate Democrat sidesteps questions about expanding Supreme Court'The American people have watched Republicans packing the court over the last three and a half years,' Sen Dick Durbin tells 'Meet the Press' MeetThePress who gives a shit!!!!!!! why is the media covering this so dam annoying MeetThePress emails 2.0 MeetThePress What's with the defensiveness? PACK THE COURT! Perfectly legal, totally necessary.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court nominee Barrett pledges to follow law, not personal viewsAmy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump's pick for a U.S. Supreme Court vacancy, said she will rule based on the law, not her personal views, in prepared remarks issued on Sunday ahead of her Senate confirmation hearing this week. And yet somehow all of her decisions will align to her personal views. Right what about creating precedent?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »