Amy Coney Barrett Says She Will Be An Impartial Justice In Opening Remarks

  • 📰 Forbes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 65 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 29%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The judge’s ability to rule independently of her personal beliefs has been scrutinized in recent weeks.

, which will be presented at Monday’s Senate judiciary Committee Hearing amid a whirlwind push from Republicans for speedy confirmation before the election, was published Sunday morning.

In the remarks, Barrett, a conservative Christian, addresses mounting concern about her ability to judge independently of her personal beliefs, called into question after a series of reports revealed she had not disclosed certain information to the Senate. Referencing her short tenure as a judge on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Barrett said: “In every case, I have carefully considered the arguments presented by the parties, discussed the issues with my colleagues on the court, and done my utmost to reach the result required by the law, whatever my own preferences may be.”

Barrett also said that when she writes an opinion, she asks herself how she would view the decision if one of her children was the party she was ruling against, and re-emphasized the influence of Justice Antonin Scalia on her approach. “His judicial philosophy was straightforward: A judge must apply the law as written, not as the judge wishes it were,” wrote Barrett. “The policy decisions and value judgements of government must be made by the political branches elected by and accountable to the People,” wrote Barrett in her remarks. “The public should not expect courts to do so, and courts should not try.” a newspaper advertisement calling for an end to “the barbaric legacy of Roe v.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Conservative judges LIE to get into power. Isn't it ironic. All that 'religion' and lying is so so easy. Because they think the end result will absolve them of their lies. Once in the Supreme court this religious extremist will do as she pleases in the name of her imaginary god.

Liar

Lies, lies, lies!!!!

While funding white supremacists and speaking at their functions.

lmao

Its impossible to be impartial when you are affiliated with a religious organization.

TyphoidAmy

Praise Be. Under His Eye.

We're in the middle of voting... let's wait till 🇺🇸 Vote regardless of which party in power. 3 months before election these kind of major things should not be done until People speak their mind.

She is so ass backwards I don’t see how she could function without some personal bias getting in the way.

When it is time for the master to plant his seed, will you willingly submit to the commands of God? I'm hoping that will be one of the democratic senators opening question.

I don't want to see America the beautiful and her freedom fall to an evil communist tyranny. Everything that can be done to stop this evil tyranny must be called into active service

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 394. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Joe Biden says Amy Coney Barrett appointment 'not constitutional' as he evades court packing question again'Look, the only court packing is going on right now. It's going on with the Republicans packing the court now,' Joe Biden said. Not appropriate for the majority and well being of Americans.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Merrick Garland, Amy Coney Barrett, and the “Two-Faced,” “Duplicitous” Republican SenatorsIn 2016, eight months was a rush—but now six weeks is plenty of time to put a new justice into a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court.Here’s how Senate Republicans felt in 2016, and what they’ve said publicly now.
Source: MsMagazine - 🏆 378. / 59 Read more »

Editorial: Whether or not Amy Coney Barrett gets on the Supreme Court, abortion rights should standRegardless of whether conservative judge Amy Coney Barrett gets confirmed to the Supreme Court, she and her like-minded conservative colleagues should not look for a way to retry Roe vs. Wade. opinion Well no shit. But they probably won't. Is the point. opinion They might 'should' but they won't. opinion Amy Coney Barrett is getting on the Supreme Court whether you like it or not. No force in the world can stop this. WTF up
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »