FILE PHOTO: A sign marks a rendezvous location for Lyft and Uber users at San Diego State University in San Diego, California, U.S., May 13, 2020. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo
The companies say they would need to significantly hike prices to offset at least some of those additional costs, which in turn would likely cause a decrease in consumer demand, but cushion the blow of the added costs to the bottom line. The tussle over classification of workers highlights the political and business risks facing Uber, Lyft, DoorDash and other companies that have built businesses on workers who are not classified as employees eligible for health coverage, unemployment insurance or other benefits.
The campaign of U.S. President Donald Trump has not directly weighed in on the ballot measure, but the administration’s Labor Department in September published proposed rules that would standardize legal definitions across the country and provide more room for companies to maintain independent contractors. U.S. Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia criticized AB5 in an opinion piece published on Sept. 22.
The companies say the majority of their drivers do not want to be employees, and work fewer than 25 hours a week. Many drivers use the service to supplement income from other jobs.
Huge stupidity that gig-worker law
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Uber, Lyft spend big in California to oppose even costlier gig worker lawUber and Lyft together are spending nearly $100,000,000 on a November California ballot initiative to overturn a state law that would compel them to classify drivers as employees. That's far less than they would spend if they just paid their fucking drivers a livable wage. As a Uber driver we don’t want to be classified as employees Great!!!👎👎👎
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Uber, Lyft spend big in California to oppose even costlier gig worker lawUber Technologies Inc and Lyft Inc together are spending nearly $100 million on a November California ballot initiative to overturn a state law that would compel them to classify drivers as employees. nothing like spending your money on lawyers fighting against workers making a living wage when you could have just paid your workers in the first place. Democrat leadership in California, tax and spend. All else be damned.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Uber, Lyft spend big in California to oppose even costlier gig worker lawUber Technologies Inc and Lyft Inc together are spending nearly $100 million on a November California ballot initiative to overturn a state law that would compel them to classify drivers as employees. nothing like spending your money on lawyers fighting against workers making a living wage when you could have just paid your workers in the first place. Democrat leadership in California, tax and spend. All else be damned.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Uber, Lyft spend big in California to oppose even costlier gig worker lawUber and Lyft together are spending nearly $100,000,000 on a November California ballot initiative to overturn a state law that would compel them to classify drivers as employees. That's far less than they would spend if they just paid their fucking drivers a livable wage. As a Uber driver we don’t want to be classified as employees Great!!!👎👎👎
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »