Thomas, Alito Urge Supreme Court To ‘Fix’ Decision Legalizing Marriage Equality

  • 📰 Forbes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 42 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The court declined Monday to hear Kim Davis’ case concerning her refusal to issue same-sex marriage certificates.

that officially legalized same-sex marriage, “threaten[s] religious liberty,” saying that because of the decision, “those with sincerely held religious beliefs concerning marriage will find it increasingly difficult to participate in society without running afoul ofDavis, a Christian clerk who gained notoriety and briefly

in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage certificates to same-sex couples, was “one of the first victims of this Court’s cavalier treatment of religion” in theThe justices argued that the Supreme Court should not have “force[d]” the issue of marriage equality “upon society”—saying that if the issue had instead been resolved through state legislation, “they could have included accommodations for those who hold these religious beliefs”—and called on the court to “fix” the issues that the decision...

Five of the eight justices currently on the court are viewed as leaning conservative, and should current Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett be confirmed by the U.S. Senate, the court would have a 6-3 conservative majority, increasing the likelihood that the court could revisit or overturn the

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Our difference of opinion isn’t a problem until the government steps in between us and forces one of us conform to the other.

Interesting that they couldn’t get two more votes to hear the case out of Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Roberts.

I remember this pig

.Same gender marriage has 0 to do with religion. No clergy has ever been forced to do a marriage they didn't want & I'm speaking from personal experience.I wonder if anyone will petition to have the 1967 ruling of Living v Virginia oveturned that JusticeThomas benefitted from.

Religious freedom does not mean the ability force others to conform to your beliefs. The alternative is a quick trip to an Iranian or medieval-European style government. Religious people do not want religious freedom. Stop kidding yourself. They want religious authoritarianism

The Trumpublican view of religious freedom is that you should be able to impose your beliefs on others

Same

I say this politely, where the FUCK did separation of church and state go?

Americans are stupid. How can someone be jailed for his beliefs. Whilst ppl believe two ppl of the same sex can marry... so does he. I would have insulted the decision till court take me on for contempt. How can u force your beliefs on another person. 😠😠😠😠

Thomas and Alito are crazy. 'Religious accommodation' cannot include denial of other's rights. Such a notion would lead us to Sharia law! Animal sacrifices! Denial of Medical care to minors! Idiots!

Tell both of those 90 year old mattresses if they don't want to marry a man, then don't. Fu€king imbeciles!

How to force the Ds to pack the court in one easy step....

‘Fix’ Alito.

Satanic images in 2020 be like:

Yikes

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 394. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Justices Thomas and Alito lash out at the decision that cleared way for same-sex marriageJustice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, lashed out on Monday at the religious liberty implications of the Supreme Court's 2015 decision that cleared the way for same-sex marriage nationwide. DIY Origam Kite | How to Make Paper Kite | Step by Step Tutorial | Paper Art Idea | Updated Version They wasted absolutely zero time Old men kicking and screaming about human rights.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »