Furthermore, during the stimulus program in 2009, Congress had explicitly excluded incarcerated people from receiving payments. Therefore, it clearly has the know how to exclude people in prison, but actively chose not to do so in the 2020 Cares Act, many noted. “There is nothing in the CARES Act that gives the IRS authority to decide that incarcerated people are ineligible to receive stimulus checks,”Senator Sherrod Brown .
The lawsuit in front of Judge Hamilton challenged the IRS and Treasury Department’s refusal to issue stimulus payments to eligible incarcerated individuals. By granting the preliminary injunction, Hamiltonthat the plaintiffs “are likely to succeed on the merits of their’’ claim and that “the statute mandates distribution of the advance refund to eligible individuals.
The judge’s orders should bring relief to at least 80,000 incarcerated individuals who stand to receive upwards of $100 million in stimulus check relief. The population eligible for relief may be much higher as the lawsuit alleged that over 1.4 million individuals had been affected by the IRS rule denying payments to incarcerated individuals.
Mona Tawatao of the Equal Justice Society, an attorney for the plaintiffs. “The court’s order will bring them critical relief and some measure of justice.”
Democrat Judge for sure ! Democrat states ! If is something is looking ridiculous, it's Dem !
“preliminary injunction requiring the IRS and Treasury Department to stop withholding stimulus checks solely on the basis of their incarceration status.”
We serious serious ?
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »