Roe v. Wade could hang in the balance of a SCOTUS fight — a reminder of the financial barriers that abortion seekers face

As abortion-rights supporters fear for the fate of Roe v. Wade amid Republicans’ push to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Supreme Court seat, it’s worth recognizing the existing financial difficulties that abortion seekers — and those who are denied the procedure — face today.

“The fate of our rights, our freedoms, our health care, our bodies, our lives, and our country depend on what happens over the coming months,” Alexis McGill Johnson, the president and CEO of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement after Ginsburg’s death.

Marjorie Dannenfelser, the president of the anti-abortion Susan B. Anthony List, offered condolences on Ginsburg’s death and went on to call the Supreme Court vacancy “a turning point for the nation in the fight to protect its most vulnerable, the unborn.” Barrett has also been paraphrased as saying the watershed 1973 ruling Roe had created “through judicial fiat a framework of abortion on demand.” The judge has added, however, that it’s “very unlikely” the fundamental right provided by Roe v. Wade would be overturned — and suggested the current controversy lies in public versus private funding for abortions.

If Roe were overturned, abortion would stay legal in 21 states; be unprotected by state and district law in five states, the District of Columbia and two U.S. territories; and likely be prohibited in 24 states and three territories, according to the nonprofit Center for Reproductive Rights, which supports access to safe abortion.

The Hyde Amendment, which bars the use of federal funds for abortions under Medicaid except in certain cases, poses another barrier to low-income people; a majority of states don’t allow their own funds to be used for abortions for Medicaid-insured women. Meanwhile, a number of states restrict insurance coverage of abortion in private insurance plans, health-insurance exchange plans, and/or public employees’ health plans.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Ginsburg flap shows Supreme Court, justices are too important'When your political system can be thrown into hysteria by something as predictable as the death of an octogenarian with advanced cancer, there’s something wrong with your political system,' writes usatodayopinion columnist Glenn Harlan Reynolds. usatodayopinion He's down to five picks now. At least his White House staff got far-right, racist Donald Trump to cross off Hitler's frozen brain from the SCOTUS list. usatodayopinion usatodayopinion Except the only reason this is viewed as a crisis is because you the media in cahoots with the Democratic Party are whipping up the crazies for clicks.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

How A Supreme Court Vacancy Could Spell The End Of Legal AbortionA legal scholar on the fate of Roe v. Wade after the death of liberal giant Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »