Conservatives push anti-abortion rights as litmus test for next nominee

  • 📰 MSNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

After a year of mixed opinions from the US Supreme Court, some Republicans are insisting that the next Supreme Court nominee publicly commits to conservative causes, especially anti-abortion rights.

Lagoa is a Cuban American from Florida who sits on the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Atlanta. One aspect of her record that is troubling to conservatives is an answer she provided to written questions for her confirmation hearing in 2019 when she said that Roe v. Wade “is binding precedent” and that she “would faithfully follow it as I would follow all precedent of the Supreme Court.

Now with a 53-seat majority, McConnell can lose the support of three Republicans and still get a nomination confirmed , so conservatives are pushing for a more conservative nominee, saying they can no longer trust what a nominee would do without some verification. Sen. Mike Braun, R-Ind., said a socially conservative justice is something Republicans owe to their voters. He, like Hawley, was elected in 2018 in large part, they say, on the issue of the Supreme Court. McConnell refused to consider President Barack Obama's nomination after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February 2016, making the Supreme Court squarely an issue in the presidential election nine months later.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

They just want to go backwards, today is 2020 not 1920. I know many swedish people looked at USA as the promised land but not anymore, this is so sad to break promises for power. It looks like Trump has something on them, perhaps secret meetings or money they dont want to share

How can we have a fair and just judiciary if we appoint outwardly unimpartial justices? Our nation will fail is partisanship rules from the highest court.

Everything is on the table said the Brownshirt

So the Conservatives only want a Justice who PROMISES to ignore PRECEDENCE? Well okay then. The Law of Retribution wants to know if we’re now going to have a political party decide that Supreme Court decisions will be overturned each time a party gets a 5-4 advantage? Fuck me :-(

But of course it’s not judicial activism.

WTF

X

No matter what happens, if the Republicans win, then the Democrats will go back and regroup and wait until there is a Democratic majority on the SCOTUS. If the Democrats win, then the Republicans will have to regroup and try again. This is going to be a lifelong fight....

In case you had doubts about the motivation here

Anti abortion is the most garbage idea - especially with exploding populations and the poles melting. So wrong. There’s too many humans for the planet to support. Let’s create MORE MORE MORE ⁉️⁉️

Oh, so legislating from the bench is cool if conservatives do it

If you are anti-abortion no one will force you to have an abortion. Those are anti-abortion rights. You already have them.

Careful what you wish for.

Good idea! So then we know to tell our senate reps who not to vote for SMH

I’m waiting to see how the anti abortion argument plays into repealing gay marriage, which is really what the Pubs are after.

Any conservative candidate who submits to this kind of extortion has no place on SCOTUS.

MSNBC shame on you! U R doing what trump wants, taking the focus off of Covid. Stop covering the SCOTUS status, we ALL know the republicans are going do what the republicans are gonna do.STOP giving them a platform.We’ll REFORM the courts when Biden is prez and add 6 more judges

🐃💩

Yea the ones who can’t get pregnant themselves

Fake news!

conservative causes? anyone know what those are anymore? is death penalty a conservative cause? some are “insisting”? did you not get what you paid for?

Why would it matter? All democrats would have to do is pass a law making it legal again worded differently of course.

How can they even have such a litmus test? I thought they ruled on law not political ideology.

Hell, we thought Roberts was going to do that.

Choose wisely when you vote 🗳

conservative causes, especially anti-abortion rights. is a MASK for SUPPRESSING ALL Women's Rights women already receive LESS than men on SOCIAL SECURITY caused by a lifetime of WOMAN'S WAGE SUPPRESSION

The Christo-fascists want what now?

Fill the vacancy now

Bad political move. But what would this woman know 🤷‍♀️

This man not only has no neck, he has no spine! Mitch McConnell, a man who actually wants to be called the Grim Reaper, democratic legislation killer! He really said that, STJ Denver! Shame on you people!

In other words, screw the Constitution and vote with Puritan Christian issues in mind.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 469. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Conservatives Signal Roe v. Wade Showdown After Ruth Bader Ginsburg's DeathA number of anti-abortion politicians and activist groups are calling on President Trump to choose her replacement without delay. That's his JOB as president. The Supreme Court is NOT a political entity. It it there to uphold the constitution. Of course they are - it is a politically dangerous time for women in US especially as they have Judge Kavanagh
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »

News Analysis: Justice Ginsburg's successor could push the Supreme Court to end abortion rights and ObamacareNews Analysis: RBG's successor could push the Supreme Court to end abortion rights and Obamacare One can only hope 👍 Finally 🇷🇺The Russian Health Ministry reported on Sunday that the country had registered 6.148 new cases of COVID-19 during the last day. In the same period,there were 79 deaths from the coronavirus. 🔴30000 € Criminal complaint for continued police torture against the Spanish state.🇪🇸
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

How a New Conservative Justice Could Affect the Supreme CourtA third Supreme Court confirmation during Donald Trump's presidency would change a narrow conservative edge to a comfortable majority. Here's what that could mean for key issues like abortion and health care Only if the Democrats roll over. They could really screw the GOP next year in retaliation. How is this anything....but...backwards Their desire to move so quickly tells you just how concerned they are and how sure they are if a Trump election loss. If they believed he could win, they wouldn't mind waiting.
Source: NYMag - 🏆 111. / 63 Read more »

Opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg protected your abortion rights. Be afraid now that she's goneOpinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg protected your abortion rights. Be afraid now that she's gone (via latimesopinion) opinion 😭😭😭😭 opinion She made a career of twisting the meaning of the Constitution to suit her own personal agendas. She was an Activist and NOT a good unbiased Judge...those are the facts! opinion What you meant to say is Ruth ensured you could legally murder a child in the womb.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

How McConnell Can Quickly Push Through Trump's NomineeWASHINGTON -- Hours after the Supreme Court announced the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Friday, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, vowed that the Senate would vote on a replacement named by President Donald Trump, setting up what is all but guaranteed to be a heated fight I love AmyMcGrathKY & hope she wins (I’m donating) but it wouldn’t break my heart to see MoscowMitch as an impotent minority senator
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

'This Is Why We Wanted This Guy': Conservatives Push Trump to Fill Court Seat QuicklySocial conservatives and evangelical Christian activists began mobilizing over the weekend to push for the speedy confirmation of the person President Donald Trump ultimately nominates to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, sensing that their long-denied goal of shifting the Supreme Court decisively Yes a more Liberal Judge might vote toward fair election or clean air or personal rights or maybe go crazy and vote on justice for all! wow so radical NOT! The fair right are far wrong So wrong. Needs to be stopped
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »