The Conservative Defense of Kyle Rittenhouse Is Dangerous Nonsense

  • 📰 Slate
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 24 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

According to right-wing media, the Kenosha shooter is innocent until proven guilty and his apparent victims are guilty until proved innocent.

: “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?”

these protesters were trying to confiscate Rittenhouse’s gun, they were wrong to do so, because they were the vicious lawbreakers and he was the vulnerable peacekeeper. Third, you must embrace a definition of self-defense so capacious that it allows a gunman to legally shoot a civilian dead when that civilian is trying to seize a weapon, “if someone is trying to stop you after you killed someone, you can continue shooting and killing in ‘self-defense.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Excellent article. Thanks for telling things as they are instead of diluting outrageous things with false equivalences. I’d add that paramilitary forces are symbiotic with powerful, economic dominant groups (think Colombia) against those dispossessed, precisely to maintain power.

It's deplorable

“Alt” with reference to media or politics is code for “Nazi”.

The 'victims' were all found guilty previously by the judicial system. 'Innocent until proven guilty' is the right of the shooter, who has been charged. BTW, has the guy who lived - a felon prohibited by law from possessing a firearm - been brought up on charges yet?

What is non sense is to compare a child to a grown up person. Is like blaming the kid for not protecting itself, isn't someone supposed to protect him? He seems to had acted in self defense as per this reality you are proving.

According to Slate its ok to destroy your Country burn loot steal but not ok to protect it

Didn't they say he was carrying legally. Not sure on all the legal mumbo jumbo, maybe he doesn't get chased and attacked without the gun. But was he supposed to let them beat the crap out of him. It almost looked like he tried to hit the guy in the arm, tho that may be a stretch.

This isn't merely supporting vigilantes. It is supporting right wing extremist terrorism.

The video clearly shows rioters attacking him. What alternate reality are you from?

It’s become a sickness that rivals Covid.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 716. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Suspect Charged With Murder After 2 Shot Dead At Kenosha ProtestBREAKING: Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, of Antioch, IL, has been charged with first-degree murder in Kenosha, Wisconsin, according to Lake County, Illinois Clerk of Courts records Are they taking him to Disneyworld first because last night they gave him water to hydrate himself before he want on his killing spree... Nullify this jury. Not guilty. Real Headline: Boogaloo Boi Intent On Civil War Crosses State Lines to Murder POC NoPardonsForRacistWarmongers
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Blue Lives Matter Supporters Say Kyle Rittenhouse Not Reflective Of Most Peaceful Apologists For Police StateNEW YORK—After an AR-15-wielding teenager was charged with the first-degree murder of two protesters in Kenosha, WI, Blue Lives Matter supporters told reporters Thursday that Kyle Rittenhouse’s actions did not reflect the nonviolent tactics favored by most police-state apologists. “When you see us out there waving ‘thin blue line’ flags and menacing the public with semiautomatic rifles, please know that the majority of us are just peacefully expressing our support for a system in which police officers are allowed to kill with impunity,” said Blue Lives Matter activist Gordon Hamblett, explaining that the movement did not stand for lethal vigilante violence, but rather for lethal state-supported violence carried out in the name of keeping people safe. “Do we sympathize with this 17-year-old police admirer’s desire to live out a long-nurtured militia-man fantasy of patrolling the streets and administering justice? Certainly. Does the real blame ultimately lie with the people who were shot for failing to obey his orders? Of course. Nonetheless, we cannot condone Rittenhouse’s decision to pull the trigger without a badge.” Hamblett added that anyone who was considering mowing down innocent civilians on a public street should at least enroll in a police academy first.\n Not all police apologists are high school drop outs with criminal records. Next time you are being beaten in the street i want you to call the cops that you so gracefully want defunded instead bravo
Source: TheOnion - 🏆 724. / 51 Read more »