This followed a decision by High Court Judicial Commissioner Datuk Ahmad Shahrir Mohd Salleh Wednesday .
In dismissing the MACC’s application, Ahmad Shahrir said the court found that the anti-graft agency had not adduced sufficient evidence to support its application to warrant an order for forfeiture to be granted. The JC also said that on the balance of probabilities, the applicant had not succeeded in proving the requirements under Section 56 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act to have the sum of RM188,138.26 in SUPP's accounts forfeited.Deputy public prosecutor from the MACC Abdul Rashid Sulaiman said the prosecution would file a notice of appeal against the decision to the Court of Appeal.
She said the action was taken under the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001. - Bernama
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: msianinsight - 🏆 8. / 63 Read more »
Source: theSundaily - 🏆 25. / 51 Read more »
Source: malaymail - 🏆 1. / 86 Read more »