Do we really want a man consumed with rage, self-pity and hate on the Supreme Court? - Los Angeles Times

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 82%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

'Just as I believed Anita Hill in 1991,' AbcarianLAT writes, 'I believe Christine Blasey Ford.'

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

You mean the man who was accused of sexual assault by a woman who had no clear recall of the event- waited until he was being vetted for the SC everyone believed unquestionly when her best friend couldn't place her at ' that' party. No police report no trial nothing. That man?

Well he had every right to be pissed cause it turned out to be all BS! Now we have Joe's Sexual Assault huh! Do we want a sexual predator as our President in 2020? Why aren't you reporting on that? What happened to the MeToo Movement? Where are the Believers!?

Robin boy remember one thing no one is perfect in this world ifyou don't believe me Take a look in the mirror boy

metaquest I mean. Look who's President

great article. is it not quite simple: we were there to hear allegations, se was truthful and he wasn't. Ergo, disqualified.

Idiots voted for Trump so... What is a more to say?

Hell to the NO. He seems really unstable to me. He can enjoy his BEER from home . Please and thank you.

I would b pissed off 2 if someone accursed me of something l didn't do

We do not need a crazy rage man to sit on the Supreme Court. He should do all of us a favor and step-down.

If he did not ge upset story would be he was cold and calculated so again fake news. Fu

SenatorCollins lisamurkowski JeffFlake SenBobCorker

DO WE HAVE A CHOICE!

No, no, no, and a zillion times no!

They threatened his family and career with false accusations. I would have bashed their heads in with a bat. Idiots. Maybe Americans should start tracking down liberal families and see how they respond to being threatened.

And we don’t want Diane Feinstein also

Have you noticed The raging crowds of women who are filled with their boo hoo stories that could go on forever Self pity. No concern for law and justice. They would have screaming mob given the same as they have dished out

Yes. He won’t put up with shit. He will tell it like it is. Bill Clinton was accused of rape and Hillary threatened the women who wanted to state their case. They have been above the law. I’d be angry too at the abuse. The senate needs to vote

Rage is a necessary quality for justice. How it possible to become a Supreme court judge without any corruption if nomination success depends on media = media owners? They pumped this row based just on words and nothing else.

Yes

He likes beer. He drinks beer. He likes beer.

Uh no

phillipstribune Or on the circuit court.

Oh, you all saw that also; I thought it was just I...some people use positions as tools for revenge..

We’ve got one in the White House.

I sure don’t. All the evidence was on his opening statement

This man's outrage shows him up. His outrage showed a nerve hit.

Taking shit from ambushing, head hunting liberals & realizing in the process that you had practiced some of your Dads traits could be an emotional deal.

He has right to defend himself

Um no

You mean Feminist not Columnist.

A Republican yes

phillipstribune Yeah How dare he defend himself against charges of being a gang rapist. He should have accepted this smear campaign with acceptance and kindness. Democrats poke this man in the eye and then throw up their hands in amazement when he gets angry. Disgraceful.

Yes! I’d be angry if left extremist did a hit job on me and smeared my good name. Yes I’d be angry... Kavanaugh is exactly who we want in SCOTUS. He is not a push over, he will not bend easily. He is the type of guy America needs. Tough.

No but I don’t get a vote SAD

You people really are full of yourselves. This wasn't a man of hate. Mr. Kavanaugh has every right to defend himself against all of you crooked, dishonest, raging lunatics. I'm so thankful I'm not a member of your pitiful, disgusting party. Folks are leaving the left every day👍

Screw you latimes! Doesnt a man have a right to be angered over a false slandarous allegation!?

Take a REAL good at Kavanaugh's July 1, 1982 calendar. It clearly states he was "going to Timmy's house with P.J Smythe & Mark Judge for "skis". Short for Brewski's. Lynn Brookes & Liz Swisher says Brett was a "sloppy, slurring, stumbling drunk! He would drink to excess!!

Anyone would be outraged if they had to defend themselves from such an outrageous charge!

He is a right wing crazy. Has no business on the supreme court our any court.

well ya know..the grls so theyre is only sht out there now soooo?

This is an excellent article that poses several valid reasons why this man should NEVER be allowed to sit on the Supreme Court...

Have you ever been accused of something that you didn’t do? Umm I bet you would be pissed also.

Was concerned about his character..now I'm concerned about his character, temperament and beer problem. That was quite a show

Well if it's good enough for the Presidency...

Rage? This man is a very well spoken person. People trying to destroy him. And his little daughter 10 years old still wants to ptay for that one. That is a man who teaches his children the right way.. A man of character

And this character assumption is based on one incident? Sorry I don't jump to conclusions that easily... 🙄 KavanaughHearings Kavanaugh

ABSOLUTELY! If his (JudgeKavanaugh) ego is so precious, so fragile that he's able to blow up at senators, then this man is not objective or controlled enough on a professional level to serve on the SupremeCourt, period. Even the Americanbarassociation wants an investigation!

I don’t think so — how about you?

no

No way in hell!

And if you were publicly accused of a heinous crime that you did not commit, would you be content and full of good will?

No

No.

you mean a human being ?

Nope!

The answer is NO.

I’d be pissed too if some lunatic made false allegations. All Democrats are lunatics

Officially now blocked.... you’ve crossed the line with me for the very last time.

I did not see a man “full of hate”. I saw a human being that was frustrated and emotional at times and rightfully so considering what both sides of the isle put both he and Ford through for the past 10 days only to try and gain the political advantage. Shame!

You must be talking about Keith Ellison. He beat his girlfriend with his fists. WalkAwayFromDemocrats2018

We only accused him of being a gang rapist and threatened to kill his wife and children. Why was he acting so upset?

No, we need someone, whether he or she be conservative or not, who is well adjusted.

Wow.

Do we really want a news media that distorts the news? Are you really insane?

No way! He’s arrogant and does not have the temperament and honesty of a decent man.

He isn’t even fit for the people’s court tv show!

He will gladly take his shoes off for you to wear. You would be able to see how it feels to have your reputation and families lives dragged through the mud. Because a PhD Psychologist says so. There are so many holes in her statements. How about her fund account almost $700,000.

Nooooo

Even if he is telling the truth, it is apparent that his mannerisms aren’t judicial. For that reason, he shouldn’t be nominated to the SCOTUS position.

NO!!!!!

Yup. Because the checks and balances of the court and the processes to get even considered are sound. This argument of temperament is frivolous at best and inane at worst.

Do we really want a left wing rag paper columnist Robin Abcarian giving advice?

Pathetic

No thank you

Hmmm...after his vailed threat, "What goes around, comes around". I'd say no. He should not receive a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court.

Why are Dems so desperate to bring FBI ? They know the FBI will side with Dems and prolong hopefully I’m totally wrong-

He was defending his integrity you nit wit and he did a job well done! Dems are corrupt lying stall weasels did any other judge go through what Kavanaugh did a day b4 voting?! Yes it’s what Dems 🤡🤥do!!!! Not cool it’s the most evil thing anyONE can do to slaughter the nominee😤

Yes!!!

Referring to your headline here: SenBooker is not the nominee! 😂

Not me!!!!

Wow, LA Times will print anything!

No

you mean should we stand idle while liberals destroy a man's life to further the communist movement in the US? i would be pissed too if i was accused by liars

Yes

Absolutely not. It goes to temperament and character. I felt I saw a spoiled brat having a tantrum.

You are a failing news source

This is what I'm thinking, guilty or not, look at his attitude. He did not have composer to handle this interview.

Even if he's cleared of everything he's accused of, his behavior is not one of a man that should be sitting on the high court of this land.

When a guy lies about stuff on a yearbook - the Devil’s Triangleis NOT a drinking game and Bloofing is NOT farting - what else is he lying about?

Ilikebeer

Righteous anger

Wait, so you’re saying he shouldn’t feel bad that his name was dragged through the mud for political gain? I’m assuming you’re saying “don’t worry, be happy”. Sage advice

Yes.

StopKavanaughNow

A MAN HAVING A TANTRUM AND WAS NOT THE VICTIM. A NEW KIND OF STUPID

Well, we’ve got that in the President so why not on the Supreme Court bench?

HELL NO!

Based on face reading and behavioral traits I am even surprised how come he got into this profession!

No

We have so many already on the senator floor, you never said anything. Yes, he deserves to be mad. It only demonstrates that he is a human being.

No. We don't.

If you are a crusty old, narcissistic,Republican then yes!! Otherwise, no!!!!!

I can't imagine why he would be angry. Who would get angry about being falsely accused of gang rape and have death threats towards his family?

When Kavanaugh was on top of her she said she looked in the eyes of Mark Judge to see if he would help her...she knew him & his family before the incident. Judge did end up jumping on the bed and they all fell to the floor. He may have saved her...

Yes, I like someone who would show rage against any judicial nonsense such as presumption of guilt on evidenceless accusation.

(WARNING: adult language follows) No, I fucking hate Kavanaugh and the "good ole boy" entitlement he represents! Time for a change! Bring back Marrick Garland!!!!!!

I thought he was rude ..arrogant and disrespectful...frankly I was appalled KavanaghHearing

Not really KavaNO

Who also lies under oath. No. We don’t.

and entitlement. He never mentioned the role or values of the Supreme Court, how humbling it would be to be nominated, and how it made him reflect on justice and equality. It was all about him as if he were entitled to the appointment, not qualified.

No, we do not. I’d much prefer a man like Merrick Garland. StopKavanaughNow SCOTUS KavaNOPE BelieveChristine MerrickGarland Obama SusanCollins RoeVWade ChristineBlaseyFord

"waaaaaah"

Yes

phillipstribune No

No, probably not. How about running a featured spread on torture in L.A. County. Medical Grade torture. Just down the road from you... Torrance Memorial Thank you. fbi

Amen!

No but we got one in the White House

Why don’t you shut up! trump

hacks

NO NoOnKavanaugh

You guys are disgusting.

Well he only hates liberals, Clintons and Dem's soo

Does your institution really care about reporting fair, unbiased news?

Aggressive, angry, full of hate, condescending, this man is a train wreck for the Supreme Court.

No! He was belligerent, rude and clearly lying.

ConfirmKavanaughNOW Okay she got her GO FUND ME / Bribe Page from Democrats & Soros so let’s stop the charade ConfirmKavanaugh

It makes one wonder what kind of man would subject himself to such scrutiny...with so many skeletons in his closet...

That would disqualify 99% of men.......

twowisegals Hack

Yes we do. Unless you find a real serial rapist and e can put him on SC instead. You have only racism and rape to accuse ppl of. Now we fight back. The strange taste of leather in you mouth is our boot up your arse

That description sounds like trump

Yes. We want someone who gets angry when his entire career, life and reputation is destroyed by a false sexual allegation orchestrated by leftist extremists hell bent on getting power at any cost.

Yeah why not just lay down or would you prefer he BEND OVER while you FakeNews & CORRUPT Democrats publicly SCREW him based on lies & innuendo?! How inconvenient of Kavanaugh to be UPSET at shady POS trying to RUIN HIS LIFE over some lying nutter

Dems newest line of attack. Falsely accuse a man of being a serial rapist, and then declare him unfit for the job when he defends himself by saying that he’s filled with hate and rage towards the people saying it about him

And rapey, apparently

No, that should be in the White House.

I want a man fighting for his family, his reputation and putting the TRUTH out there! You liberal guys will lose in the end. He is going to the Supreme Court!!!!! Get ready.

of a party whose furthest left screams and yells at people in public restaraunts b/c they don't like their politics and whom they work for. If kavanaugh wasn't humming show tunes enough for you LAT, tough. Look what the democratic party will do when its authority is challenged.

Its estrange to me how childish Senate, and Everyone in Congress is. They are fools with rage and lies. Another thing that is absolutely crazy is how powerful democrats are in media, and social. They are adding major fuel to the fire! Who knows what else they are spinning

We’re going to get a sexist, racist pawn of dishonorable Trump either way but you’d think they’d cut bait on this whiny, nightmare nominee.

Thanks Robin. It’s exact what decent people are feeling right now

NO WE DON’T

Yea, LA Times. How DARE kavanaugh raise his voice after having to listen (along w/ his family) to how he's a rapist and a sexual predator (and even worse) for 2 weeks while he just had to sit there and smile like a good boy. This coming from the paper that supports the politics..

No he was out of line talking back to DEMs angry man didn’t have his drink tht day huh

NO

No. Nor a man showing hostility to the senators . I liked the LATimes article with comments of four psychologists.

Not even if it was fake-a show for WH!l & accept'g email w/Subject "spying" & 1st line "...mole in..." from early-mid 2000s & denying he had no idea emails were stolen!! In his WH position time he should have questioned origin. This guy is a liar... to Americans & doesn't care.

That's a face that I want NOWHERE near our govt, or ANY position of power. DelayTheVote

Short answer: NO

Again, Times doing a 💩 job.

No, who clearly cant control himself and own up to the truth. All court hearings he has ever set on the bench for needs to be reopened and examined funder SenFeinstein SenKamalaHarris SenAmyKlobuchar SenGillibrand SenBlumenthal SenBooker SenatorDurbin SenateDems

The USA is 51% female. What are the percentages of women on the SCOTUS? Or the Senate? And even HouseOfRepresentitives? NotEvenClose. WhyWeAreNotGreat

NO!

Didn’t these last two days show us that what we want doesn’t matter?

Good thing it's not up to you people

As if these conservative idiots don't have another conservative judge they could've pulled out of their magic hat for this job?

Brett Kavanaugh showed the world yesterday precisely the caliber of man he is and any Senator foolish enough to endorse him deserves to have their morals and sanity questioned.

AbcarianLAT Apolitical: Clearly, nomination already happened by Dictatorship Privilege Obstruction of Justify—for almighty$—This man could set family on fire on national TV & will still get nominated. POTUS blocking FBI investigation created this smoke-n-mirrors useless circus SenatorDurbin

AbcarianLAT

AbcarianLAT In both cases, the accusers brought unsubstantiated allegations without offering any witnesses or evidence and were believed only by the weak minded.

AbcarianLAT How can anyone in their right mind automatically believe someone they don't know? When there is doubt we favor the accused.

AbcarianLAT You can also win a couple of lotteries. That doesn't mean you have more insight than anyone. Without anything, this is a wild guess. Keep it for yourself, or if you want to bet, go for it. But it has no value to the rest of us.

AbcarianLAT Of course, would not expect you to be objective.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Brett Kavanaugh confirmed as a Supreme Court justice, cementing conservative control of the nation’s highest courtThe Senate voted Saturday to confirm Judge Brett Kavanaugh as a Supreme Court justice, cementing conservative control of the highest court in the land for years to come and ending a bitter battle over his nomination. Vote Kavanaugh down! Now Impeach Trump for Obstruction of Justice. Veto denied. .. ABornCitizen
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Appeals Court Sets Up Supreme Court Showdown Over Census QuestionAn appeals court ruling has set up a Supreme Court showdown over whether Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross must sit for questioning under oath as part of multiple lawsuits over his decision to add a question about U.S. citizenship status to the 2020 census. Wonder which way this will go 🙄 Oh good so we can bet that he’s probably not going to have to sit since Kavarape is on the court now. I am sure we NOW know the outcome.
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court fight over Kavanaugh got lots of attention, but most federal court action is elsewhereOPINION: Supreme Court fight over Kavanaugh got lots of attention, but most federal court action is elsewhere You mean the fight over the attempted rapist? Save the babies and the rapists..... ChessCheckers
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Europe’s top court orders Poland to halt a law forcing Supreme Court judges into retirementThe ruling sets up a possible clash between Poland’s right-wing government and E.U. authorities. Screw Europe’s “court”.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Poland must 'immediately suspend' law over Supreme Court judges, EU's top court saysThe European Union's highest court has ordered Poland to 'immediately suspend' the application of a controversial law, which lowered the retirement age of its Supreme Court judges Nothing like being in a Union where your laws are dictated to you by others Poland,follow the U K's lead . The E U is suffocating in its own bureaucracy When the wishes of your citizens gets overruled by foreigners. So glad we have trump and not an appeaser to the rest of the world. keepcounteiessovereign
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Top EU Court Blocks Polish Supreme Court Law Forcing Judges To RetireSince going into effect in July, nearly a third of Poland's judges have been ousted. Friday's ruling orders officials to reinstate justices and raise the mandatory retirement age from 65 back to 70. So much for sovereignty. I bet the tell the EU to piss off. Poland is a sovereign country. The EU really only exists on paper. SeCReT SoCieTy ExPoSeD! SiT TheRe w/ Ur NoSe In the AiR BuT GueSS WaT, ALLLLL Ur EliTe PriViLeDGeS CaN Be TaKeN AwaY If U ABuSe Ur PoWeR! WhiTe PeoPLe CoMMiT CriMeS JusT As OFTeN! DiFFeRenCe is LaWYeRs vs PuBLiC DeFenDeRs! And NoW I See......the JudGe PreSidinG OVeR Ur CaSe!🐷
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Trump can’t end DACA, appeals court panel says, setting up Supreme Court fightThe Trump administration already has asked the justices to move quickly to add it to the docket for this term. This is pure politics, will be overturned 6-3, 7-2. There is no constitutional right to DACA protections! What can be done with executive authority can be undone! Next step SCOTUS K-K-K-Kavanaugh.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court to Rule on Kavanaugh Appeals Court SEC CaseSupreme Court justices on Monday will effectively be asked to rule on the jurisprudence of their newest colleague in a fraud case that tests how far the SEC can go in holding stockbrokers accountable for disseminating false statements to clients. Yeah now why would we want to police that Cheesy grin on that rat. Of course he did. Why he was nominated by realDonaldTrump
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court gives victory to Planned Parenthood in Medicaid caseThree of the court's conservatives said the court should have taken up the case, but Justice Kavanaugh and Chief Justice Roberts voted with the majority. And Kavanaugh was the deciding vote, he’s a republican judge right?
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »