The petition, according to Daton, touches on the vulnerability and susceptibility of Filipinos, who are online mostly in social media, to become victims of the new law’s vague definition of terrorism and acts of terror.
Similar to the other petitions, they want the high court to nullify the following provisions for being unconstitutional:Section 6 – planning, training, preparing and facilitating the commission of terrorism;Section 10 – recruitment to and membership in a terrorist organization;Section 25 – designation of terrorist individual, groups of persons, organizations or associations;Section 27 – preliminary order of proscription; andConcerned Online Citizens composed of bloggers, social media...
They added that the vagueness of the new anti-terror law poses the danger of curtailing the people’s fundamental freedoms of speech, expression, and assembly as well as the freedom of the press since this will discourage citizens from airing their opinions on sensitive political and social issues for fear of violating the law.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: manilabulletin - 🏆 25. / 51 Read more »
Source: inquirerdotnet - 🏆 3. / 86 Read more »