, and that the case hinged on the specific interests of one family, not the broader questions of vaccine benefits and risks.Article content continuedquietly this spring, saying the case was now in the public sphere of the courts — not a private arbitration — and the results could have a broader societal impact.
Ruling as an arbitrator on one such disagreement last year, lawyer Herschel Fogelman sided with the mother and said the children should not receive standard childhood vaccinations. He cited at length testimony from, an American doctor who has shifted her practice largely to alternative medicine and is a staunch vaccine critic.
to help the father’s case, have since responded that the scientific record contradicts most of Bark’s contentions.
'The arbitrator also ordered the father to pay $35,000 of his ex-wife’s legal costs, $11,000 of that to cover Bark’s fees'. And this is why there is a never ending supply of childless miserable women. NOT WORTH THE RISK.
Argue in favour of vaccines all you like - I am not an anti vaxxer. Try touching my children without my permission though and you better call yourself an ambulance ahead of time.
She looks Evil
Why do all these health officials look so unhealthy? Don't we have any fit and robust people in charge of health matters working in government?
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Sportsnet - 🏆 57. / 59 Read more »