The Supreme Court’s Historic LGBTQ Ruling and the Road Ahead

  • 📰 wwd
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 52 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 68%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The court affirming federal protections for gay and transgender employees opens a new door in the ongoing struggle for civil rights.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s monumental ruling last week that LGBTQ employees are protected by federal civil rights laws was one culmination of decades of hard-fought advocacy by the LGBTQ community.

For one thing, claims under Title VII would have to be first filed as a “charge of discrimination” with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the federal agency overseeing employment discrimination issues, or a state counterpart. This is because Title VII requires employees to show that they’ve exhausted their administrative channels for seeking remedy.

Until this point, it was largely up to state and local jurisdictions to extend civil rights laws to LGBTQ employees. Only some 22 states and Washington, D.C., had barred discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, while a few other states offered more limited version of such protections, according to the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBTQ civil rights advocacy group.

Carmelyn Malalis, chair and commissioner of the agency, said the agency’s approach speaks to a mission dating back to its origins in the Forties, when then-Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia established a committee amid race riots in the city over police brutality.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 24. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Trump Says He Wants To Punish Flag Burning With A Year In PrisonThe Supreme Court has already ruled such legislation unconstitutional, and the Roberts Court is unlikely to reconsider that ruling. HK mobs, listen! I say just take away welfare. The Supreme Court ruled that burning the flag is protected free speech. I'm not an advocate FOR flag burning, but it could be a dangerous slippery slope if we start throwing people in prison for actions or gestures that we deem offensive.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court set to rule on landmark abortion case that could limit women's accessWhen Louisiana native Kim O'Brien decided to have an abortion in 2011 because her pregnancy had severe complications, she was unaware of the difficulties she would face -- including traveling to another state -- to get the care she is legally entitled to through Roe v. Wade. Now, nine years later
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Trump to issue executive order limiting temporary work visasTrump's executive order comes days after the Supreme Court ruled the administration erred in its effort to halt the DACA program created by Obama. Big mistake. A LOT OF scientists working on the covid vaccines are on this visa. A lot of physicians are too. fail DRAIN THE TRUMP SWAMP‼️ That means lying, crooked Donald Trump and ALL of his crooked, criminal, cronies‼️ Good for President Trump. AmericansFirst
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Family's abortion story sheds light on stakes of Supreme Court rulingAmerica is awaiting the Supreme Court's decision on an abortion case out of Louisiana that could significantly alter abortion access. There are more rights for those seeking abortions than those who want to express their 2nd amendment. BabyLivesMatter Seeking from Amicus Curiae often is a smart choice. But I can not agree it more that Relevant law will be made for drop the rate of woman’s access. In so many countries in the world this action is not in legal and also immoral. It can be a killing case to a innocent baby
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rules SEC can recoup money in fraud casesThe Supreme Court has preserved an important tool used by securities regulators to recoup ill-gotten gains in fraud cases First stop, across the street in the House and Senate.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Tech Challenge to IRS RulesThe U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to corporate tax regulations, delivering a victory to the Internal Revenue Service that will cost tech companies billions of dollars. OUCH glad i dumped all my tech stocks, they were hella overvalued anyway. This I personally find as a Victory for Main Street
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »