Law barring disclosure of actors' ages violates 1st Amendment, appeals court rules

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 49 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 82%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A federal appeals court rules that a California law, backed by the Screen Actors Guild, that prevented disclosure of actors' ages is unconstitutional.

in which an Academy Award-nominated actress said she had been rejected for a role because of her age.gave to the Wrap. She said a Hollywood producer had told her she was too old to play the love interest of a 55-year-old man. She was 37 at the time.

“There are things that are really disappointing about being an actress in Hollywood that surprise me all the time,” she was quoted as saying. “I’m 37, and I was told recently I was too old to play the lover of a man who was 55. It was astonishing to me. It made me feel bad, and then it made feel angry, and then it made me laugh.

Even though the intent of the law may be good, he added, “the ends do not justify any means whatsoever.” The Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, which represents about 160,000 actors, announcers, broadcast journalists and others, expressed dismay over the ruling. “We’re very disappointed by the decision, but it changes nothing about SAG-AFTRA’s commitment to change IMDb’s wrongful and abusive conduct,” SAG-AFTRA President Gabrielle Carteris said. “Neither I nor our members will stop speaking out until this outrageous violation of privacy used to facilitate discriminatory hiring ends.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Who's interested?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

California enacts November mail-ballot law — with surprising GOP supportGov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday bolstered his plan to mail every voter a ballot for the November election by signing legislation that passed earlier the same day with support from several Republicans More mike Gavin Votesome. Amirite? not too big a deal, unless California figures out how to stuff other states ballot boxes too. Though the prospect of losing some of the Republican congress folks concerns me. “several Republicans”. What does that mean? Three, maybe four?
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Appeals Court Upholds Ban on California’s Actor-Age Censorship LawSAG-AFTRA and the state of California have lost an appeal on a court’s ruling that invalidated legislation requiring subscription entertainment databases, like IMDbPro, to remove an actor’s a…
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »

The Supreme Court Ruled The Trump Administration Violated Federal Law When It Ended DACAThe court's decision does leave open the possibility that the Trump administration could rescind DACA — just that the process by which they did it in this case was unlawful. yup!! Of course they broke the law. They are criminals. HarryShannon LAW & ORDER!
Source: BuzzFeed - 🏆 730. / 51 Read more »