The Supreme Court Put DACA’s Fate In The Hands Of Voters

  • 📰 ABC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 69 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 31%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

DACA is safe—for now. FiveThirtyEight on what could happen next:

from taking another bite at the apple because the vast bureaucratic machinery that makes the census possible was already getting into gear.

This time, too, Roberts was clear that the court was not weighing in on whether DACA was a good or bad policy. “We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action,” he wrote in the opinion. The essential question, then, is whether the Trump administration followed the rules.

Both Margulies and Yale-Loehr pointed out, though, how different today’s ruling was from another Roberts-authored opinion,almost exactly two years ago. “In that case, Roberts is much more inclined to defer to the administration,” Margulies said.

And Roberts’s fellow conservatives did accuse the majority of playing politics by sidestepping what they saw as the correct legal result in favor of a ruling that would be more popular. In his dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas described the majority opinion as “mystifying” and argued that the court should have ruled that DACA was illegal instead of extending the legal fight over the program.

The decision leaves the fate of DACA in the hands of the voters and Congress, at least for now. “This is a major victory for the Dreamers, but it’s arguably only a temporary victory,” Yale-Loehr said. “A lot will depend on the outcome of the presidential election — or if Congress decides to enact a legislative solution to resolve this once and for all.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

FiveThirtyEight Quite a shame the Supreme Court ruled for injustice and socialism. Perhaps the nation should pray that Mother Natures liberally applies the WuhanVirus to them, removing them from the gene pool.

FiveThirtyEight Excerpts from today's Trump tweets: 'Shotgun Blast.' 'We need more Justices or we will lose our 2nd. Amendment & everything else. ' 'we need NEW JUSTICES of the Supreme Court.' 'Second Amendment, Right to Life, Secure Borders, and...' He's CRANKING that dog whistle today.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 471. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court blocks Trump from ending DACA📸 DACA recipients and supporters rallied outside the U.S. Supreme Court and celebrated as the court overturned Pres. Trump's 2017 decision to end the program. 'The ruling does not mean the end of challenges for DACA, however. The majority opinion states: 'The dispute before the Court is not whether DHS may rescind DACA...The dispute is instead primarily about the procedure the agency followed in doing so.' ...and a bad day for BUNKER DWELLERS: TraitorTrump TraitorInChief TOTUS = TRAITOR OF THE UNITED STATES
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court makes major decision on DACA.ABC NEWS SPECIAL REPORT: TerryMoran: 'In a stunning case, Chief Justice John Roberts, writing with the liberals, found...that Pres. Trump and his administration acted unlawfully when they ended the DACA program.' Lol not having a great day realDonaldTrump THIS CONFIRMS MY THEORY: THOSE IN POWER ARE AFRAID OF US RIGHT NOW! THEY UNDERSTAND THAT IF THEY CONTINUE TO DO THINGS THAT DO NOT HELP US, THEY WILL SUFFER REAL WORLD CONSEQUENCES! LET'S KEEP THE PRESSURE ON! Excellent...
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Trump administration illegally rescinded DACA program, Supreme Court rulesThe 5-4 decision seems certain to elevate the issue in Trump’s campaign, given the anti-immigrant rhetoric of his first presidential run in 2016 and... Fake News MarketWatch! “Illegal?” ...The court said the move to eliminate the program that grants privileges to children who entered the U.S. illegally as minors was 'arbitrary and capricious,' although they did not rule on the merits of the program itself. Awful misleading title... “that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action.” What? It’s either constitutional or it’s not. The reason should not matter!? Our Supreme Court no longer rules on constitutionality. We’re screwed.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

This is who's affected by the Supreme Court decision on DACAToday's Supreme Court ruling is one hundreds of thousands of so-called Dreamers across the United States have been anxiously awaiting for years. Here's a look at some key statistics about DACA. All law abiding citizens are effected, that’s who chrisparente They are a lot more than this stereotyped photo you chose is showing.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Supreme Court Rules Trump Wrongly Ended DACA, Leaves Program In PlaceNearly 650,000 people are currently protected from deportation under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Jolly good decision! Everybody has a right to be happy & live a decent life JuliaLaRoche This could be positive for $GEO and $CXW If they can't be deported, will they need to remain detained? Hahaha little clown can’t overturn everything
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court Blocks Trump Administration's Attempt to End DACAPeople who have lived in the United States for basically their whole lives will not — for now — be deported to countries they barely know Fantastic Awesome! So when do they rule on Trumps taxes 🤔 🔥
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »