in which the court held that some teachers at religious schools are barred by a “ministerial exception” from challenging their dismissal under civil rights laws.
In any event, Gorsuch said, “how these doctrines protecting religious liberty interact with Title VII are questions for future cases.”It’s not preordained that those future cases will result in a significant diminution of religious freedom — unless you believe religious freedom means that churches and other religious employers should be hermetically sealed off from compliance with civil rights laws.
Take the question of teachers at religious schools. Congress decided that religious employers should be allowed to favor members of their own faith in hiring, but that rightly doesn’t insulate them from lawsuits alleging that they discriminated on the basis of race or sex . Moreover, as Gorsuch noted, the court has held that some teachers at religious schools are covered by the ministerial exception, which means that they may not sue their employer under Title VII or other civil rights laws. The exact contours of the exception are unclear. The court will soon rule on whether the exception applied to the firing ofBut even if the court ruled that teachers of religion were “ministers,” it need not extend the exception to all employees of a religious school.
Denying employment to a science teacher, secretary or janitor because of sexual orientation or gender identity seems like the sort of injustice the bishops condemned. And requiring religious employers to comply with civil rights laws — a modern form of
opinion NO!!!!
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: VanityFair - 🏆 391. / 55 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »